• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Private spaceflight study aims for the moon while NASA goes deep
  • Recommended: Battle-bruised King Richard III hastily buried
  • Recommended: NASA unveils winners in space apps contest
  • Recommended: Cockroaches cut sweets — thus baits — out of their diets

News from the biggest beat in the cosmos, going out 13.7 billion light-years and taking in everything from astronomy to zoology. Join the adventure on Twitter and Facebook!

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 1
    day
    ago

    Vials of Apollo 11 moon dust found in storage

    Berkeley Lab - Roy Kaltschmidt

    Samples of moon rocks from the Apollo 11 mission were found at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    By Megan Gannon
    Space.com

    Vials of moon dust brought back to Earth by the first men on the moon have been found inside a lab warehouse in California after sitting in storage unnoticed for more than 40 years.

    The samples — collected by Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin — were rediscovered last month by an archivist who was going over artifacts tucked away at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    "We don't know how or when they ended up in storage," Karen Nelson, who made the surprising discovery, said in a statement from the lab.

    Nelson came across about 20 vials with handwritten labels dated "24 July 1970," packed in a vacuum-sealed glass jar. Accompanying the jar was an academic paper published in the Proceedings of the Second Lunar Science Conference in 1971, titled "Study of carbon compounds in Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 returned lunar samples."

    All of the authors of the paper were from the University of California, Berkeley's Space Sciences Laboratory, including Nobel Prize-winning chemist Melvin Calvin, who worked with NASA on efforts to protect the moon from contamination during the first lunar landing, as well as plans to protect Earthlings from unknown pathogens feared to be lurking in lunar dust.

    Marilee Bailey / Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    This vial of Apollo 11 moon dust from a lunar sample collected in 1969 was rediscovered 40 years later in the warehouse of Berkeley Lab in California.

    The moon dust samples were supposed to be sent back to NASA after the Space Sciences Laboratory team finished their experiments. By some wrong turn, they ended up in storage.

    After making the discovery, Nelson contacted officials at the Space Sciences Laboratory. "They were surprised we had the samples," she said.

    Nelson then got in touch with NASA officials, who allowed her to open the jar to remove the vials before she returned them to the space agency, according to the statement from Berkeley.

    In all, NASA's moonwalking Apollo astronauts brought 842 pounds (382 kilograms) of lunar samples back to Earth between 1969 and 1972, and very little of it is thought to be unaccounted for.

    Of the 68-gram batch of lunar material distributed to Calvin and his collaborators in 1970, NASA knew that only 50 grams was returned, said Ryan Zeigler, NASA's Apollo sample curator at the Johnson Space Center in Houston.

    Space agency officials assumed that the unaccounted-for 18 grams had been destroyed during testing. Zeigler thinks the rediscovered, roughly 3-gram sample likely ended up in storage as a result of some miscommunication.

    "Given the lengths taken to preserve the samples, this does not appear to have been an attempt of deliberate deception, but likely a miscommunication where some of the material was retained for ongoing or expected future studies which never happened," Zeigler wrote in an email. "Why they were never returned is unclear."

    The vials have been returned to NASA's sample vault, the curator said, but it is possible that the samples could one day end up back in a lab.

    "I do not know whether these samples will be studied again, but this sample (10059) is a very interesting Apollo 11 breccia that is in short supply, so I believe there is a good chance that this material could be used to fill future requests for this sample," Zeigler added.

    Follow Space.com on Twitter @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

    • NASA's Historic Apollo 11 Moon Landing in Pictures
    • How the Apollo 11 Moon Landing Worked (Infographic)
    • 10 Surprising Moon Facts

    Copyright 2013 Space.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    36 comments

    I'm still hoping they find the Ark of the Covenant in one of those warehouses :-)

    Show more
    Explore related topics: space, storage, featured, lawrence-berkeley-national-laboratory, apollo-mission, lost-moon-dust
  • 14
    Feb
    2012
    2:17pm, EST

    Liquid batteries to pour on green energy?

    Liquid batteries that can store excess energy generated by sources such as wind turbines could accelerate adoption of the green technology.

    By John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

    Banks of scorching hot batteries filled with molten metals may be the long-sought silver bullet to make large-scale adoption of wind and solar energy a practical, purely green reality.

    Such a storage solution is needed because, as we know, the wind doesn't always blow and the sun doesn't always shine where and when it's needed.

    "Right now, if you run a solar farm or a wind farm and you want to deliver electricity when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn’t shining, the cheapest way is to get a gas-fired peaking unit," Donald Sadoway, a materials chemist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told me Monday.

    Gas-fired peaking units are mini power plants that can be turned on and off quickly to meet demand for electricity when other sources are unavailable or maxed out.

    "Those things are cheap to buy, they are cheap to run, and the price of natural gas has been falling recently in the United States. So the way people have been looking at (shoring up) renewables is to turn to natural gas," Sadoway explained.

    "And that's fine. It's not illegal. There's nothing immoral about it," he added, "but it is not 100 percent green at this point."

    For the industry to adopt the greener battery technology, the cost of the battery has to be as cheap, efficient, and reliable as state-of-the art natural gas-fired peaking plants. 

    Sadoway and his colleagues are hard at work on a liquid battery they believe will meet these criteria. On Monday, they described their progress in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

    Metal cocktail
    The battery is a cocktail of metals that naturally settle into distinct layers because of their different densities, similar to a "black and tan" pint served at British pubs, where dark stout rests on top of denser pale ale.

    Batteries need three layers — positive and negative poles and a membrane between the charges. In the case of the liquid battery, molten metals on the top and bottom serve as the positive and negative poles and a layer of molten salt serves as the membrane.

    "The principle of the battery is an alloying reaction," Sadoway explained. 

    Alloys are metals made via the combination of two or more metallic elements. In the liquid battery, the top layer is magnesium and the bottom layer is antimony.

    "The driving force for current is the desire of magnesium to enter the antimony and form an alloy," Sadoway said. "In order to alloy, the magnesium has to first get across the molten salt and in order to do so, the magnesium has to lose two electrons and become a magnesium ion."

    Those two electrons are what escape to the wires to power our gadgets and appliances. 

    "When the magnesium ions get to the interface with the antimony, they acquire two electrons which have been pulled out of the external circuit and then that makes neutral magnesium which then alloys with the antimony," said Sadoway.

    To charge the battery, the process is reversed. 

    Sadoway and his colleagues have tweaked the recipe of this liquid cocktail for several years and gradually scaled up the size of the batteries. 

    The initial tests consisted of a battery about the size of a shot glass; then they went to a battery the size of a hockey puck and, now, the team reports a six-inch-wide version that has 200 times the storage capacity of the original.

    Keeping them hot
    To keep the metals in a liquid state requires a battery operating temperature of 700 degrees Celsius (1,292 degrees Fahrenheit).

    This heat comes at an energy cost — "we have to lose some of the energy we are storing in order to keep the battery at temperature," Sadoway explained.

    Tests show about 75 percent efficiency — that is, for every 100 units of electricity put in the battery, 75 units come out. The rest is spent keeping the battery hot and lost due to inefficiencies in power electronics and converting back and forth between AC and DC.

    A loss of 25 percent is actually quite reasonable, according to Sadoway. As long as more than a 25 percent spread between the price of electricity when the battery is charged and discharged, a utility can recoup its investment cost and make a buck.

    For example, a utility could charge up its battery in the middle of the night when the wind is blowing and rates are low and then sell it back to the grid in the afternoon when rates are high. 

    "In certain markets like California, there can be day-night price swings that can be not so many percent, but so many X," Sadoway noted. "In a market like that, this thing would do just fine."

    Battery vs battery
    According to Sadoway, who has started a company, Liquid Metal Battery Corp. to scale up and sell these batteries, the liquid approach is potentially better than competing technologies such as lithium ion batteries, which require the expansion and contraction of solid parts in order to work.

    All this swelling and contracting amounts to wear and tear, which is often why the lithium ion batteries in laptops, for example, go kaput after a few years.

    "Those kinds of failure mode are absent in this battery because it is all liquid and liquid can accommodate volume changes," Sadoway noted. 

    Lab tests, he said, show that the lifetime of the battery isn't limited by its capacity to hold a charge so much as by the lifetime of materials used to encase and insulate it.

    Current materials, he said, may begin to corrode after 10 to 15 years sufficiently to change the chemistry of the battery or permit the battery "to eat its way out of the case."

    Another advantage to the liquid technology, he added, is the abundance of the raw materials used to build it. Magnesium and antimony are abundant in the United States and low cost.

    As well, assembly of the battery is straightforward. Due to density differences, for example, the layers self assemble. "No clean rooms, no fancy nano-tech, nothing like that," Sadoway said.

    Daniel Kammen directs the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at the University of California at Berkeley. He said the biggest challenge for the liquid battery is the high operating temperature.

    "Even if the waste heat can be harvested for an added benefit, systems operating at over 1,000 degrees are going to be a challenge for long-term maintenance," he told me in an email exchange on Tuesday. 

    Shipping-container-sized battery
    Sadoway's startup up is focused on scaling up the battery technology with the best chemistry that comes out of his lab at MIT. While the lab has reached a six-inch diameter cell, the company has cells that are 16-inches in diameter, he said.

    The idea is to take these cells, stack them about 20 high, and link the stacks together in rows about 20 deep that that fit inside a 40-foot shipping container. This shipping-container-sized battery would provide about 2 megawatt hours of juice.

    By the end of 2014, the goal is "to have something that can be readily shipped to a potential customer for testing," Sadoway said.

    While the utility companies may be interested in the batteries as an alternative to gas-fired peaker plants to make their solar and wind farms viable, the batteries also could ease transmission line congestion.

    This could be particularly useful in tech-heavy regions such as the Bay Area, where the energy demands of server farms are steadily climbing, noted Sadoway.

    On certain days of the year, for example during a heat wave in the middle of the summer, "you can't get enough electricity through the lines. The transmission lines are running at full capacity," he said.

    Instead of building additional transmission capacity — bringing more wires into the city, which is usually controversial and requires a drawn-out permitting process — companies could plop a battery in the basement of their buildings.

    "From midnight to 5 a.m., when the lines aren't congested [and rates are low] you could be shipping electricity into the center of the city and storing it in the basement of these buildings," Sadoway explained. 

    "Then, in the middle of the day, you just take it right out of the basement into the servers."

    Kammen, the University of California energy professor, said this is "exciting stuff and a welcome area of long-overdue innovation."

    Updated at 1:40 pm PT to reflect comments from Daniel Kammen.

    More on battery and storage technology:

    • Energy storage breakthroughs on the horizon
    • Pourable batteries could store green power
    • Building a better battery
    • Battery tech improving as demand soars
    • Electric battery gets you gooing, gooing, gone!
    • Can EVs solve wind power puzzle

    John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. To learn more about him, check out his website and follow him on Twitter. For more of our Future of Technology series, watch the featured video below.

    Next-gen nuclear plants could provide carbon-free energy, but the painfully slow process of approving better, safer reactors — not to mention real anxiety over meltdowns and waste — threaten to derail projects before they can be built.

     

    16 comments

    Why does everything have to be so complicated? Why not just set up a reservoir up on hill? Pump the water (or any liquid, if it's a closed system) up when you produce excess power and have the liquid flow down and drive hydroelectric power when you need it.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: energy, wind, science, storage, solar, battery, innovation, featured

Browse

  • featured,
  • space,
  • science,
  • technology-science,
  • nasa,
  • cosmic-log,
  • livescience,
  • environment,
  • mars,
  • tech-science,
  • images,
  • video,
  • updated,
  • innovation,
  • climate-change,
  • asteroids,
  • moon,
  • iss,
  • new-space,
  • discoverynewscom,
  • curiosity,
  • russia,
  • physics,
  • aurora,
  • dna,
  • antarctica,
  • ouramazingplanet,
  • archaeology,
  • energy,
  • spacex,
  • space-station,
  • china,
  • comets,
  • evolution,
  • planets,
  • sun,
  • saturn,
  • weather,
  • genetics,
  • politics,
  • space-com,
  • northern-lights,
  • dinosaurs,
  • participation,
  • technology,
  • robot
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News. From climate change and mass extinctions to human evolution and deep space, his writing explores life on Earth and its place in the universe. He was a staff writer at the Environmental News Network for several years and has contributed to National Geographic News for more than a decade.

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (270)
    • April (324)
    • March (361)
    • February (295)
    • January (193)
  • 2012
    • August (1)
    • June (1)
    • May (4)
    • April (8)
    • March (11)
    • February (39)
    • January (226)
  • 2011
    • December (27)

Most Commented

  • Shocking new theory: Humans hunted, ate Neanderthals (443)
  • Why sign up for a one-way Mars trip? Three applicants explain the appeal (331)
  • Dirty dogs: Homes with pooches loaded with bacteria (147)
  • Tornado-proof homes? Up to 85 percent can be spared, expert says (144)
  • Virgin birth or hanky-panky? Anteater mom sparks a scientific debate (92)
  • Curse or coincidence? Scientists study Tornado Alley's past and future (123)
  • Satellite's failure on eve of hurricane season ruffles meteorologist (114)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Science on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise