Space Warps Collaboration

The green crosshairs pinpoint a gravitational lens lurking in an astronomical image.

Think you can find space warps? Astronomers have recruited thousands of citizen scientists to look for exoplanets, galaxies, moon craters and other cosmic curiosities — and now they need your help to go after one of the weirdest phenomena in space-time: gravitational lenses.

The Space Warps website gives Internet users the opportunity to sift through telescope images and spot galaxies so massive they bend the light rays that pass near them, like a lens. The venture could help crack some of the secrets of dark matter, the mysterious cosmic stuff that is more plentiful than the ordinary matter we see around us.

"Not only do space warps act like lenses, magnifying the distant galaxies behind them, but we can also use the light they distort to weigh them, helping us to figure out how much dark matter they contain and how it’s distributed," Oxford University physicist Phil Marshall, one of the leaders of the Space Warps research team, said in Wednesday's kickoff announcement.  "Gravitational lenses help us to answer all kinds of questions about galaxies, including how many very low-mass stars such as brown dwarfs — which aren’t bright enough to detect directly in many observations — are lurking in distant galaxies."

Space Warps is the latest gem in Zooniverse's constellation of online citizen-science ventures — a constellation that also includes Planet Hunters, Galaxy Zoo, Moon Zoo and much, much more. The warp-hunting effort follows the model set by those other projects: Participants are given online training exercises to sharpen their lens-spotting skills, and then they're set loose to check sky survey images from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope.

"Computer algorithms have already scanned the images from the CFHT survey, but there are likely to be many more space warps that the algorithms have missed. Realistic simulated space warps are dropped into some images to train the volunteers how to spot them, and reassure people that they are on the right track,’ said Anupreeta More, project co-leader from Kavli IPMU in Tokyo.

Galaxy Zoo already has demonstrated that human eyes and brains are much better than automated computer software when it comes to recognizing the subtle characteristics of astronomical phenomena. Dozens of scientific papers have been spun off from Galaxy Zoo searches — including reports on the headline-grabbing blob of green gas known as "Hanny's Voorwerp."

Space Warps could well uncover similar curiosities. Warp-hunters will be able to discuss their finds with each other and with experts on the project's online forum, and even create computer models of their discoveries. A list of gravitational lenses will be published for amateurs and professionals to investigate further.  

"Even if individual visitors only spend a few minutes glancing over 40 or so images each, that's really helpful to our research — we only need a handful of people to spot something in an image for us to say that it's worth investigating," said Oxford's Aprajita Verma, another leader of the Space Warps team.

So what are you waiting for?

More about gravitational lenses:

• Cosmic lenses find farthest galaxy yet
• Crazy cosmic lens focuses on dark matter
• Dark energy illuminated by cosmic lens

The Space Warps collaboration currently includes Phil Marshall, Aprajita Verma, Matthias Tecza, Chris Lintott, Rob Simpson (University of Oxford), Anupreeta More, Surhud More (Kavli IPMU), Amit Kapadia, Kelly Borden, David Miller, Arfon Smith (Adler Planetarium), Jean-Paul Kneib (EPFL Lausanne), Rafael Kueng, Prasenjit Saha (University of Zurich), and citizen scientists Elisabeth Baeten, Claude Cornen, Cecile Faure, Thomas Jennings, Stuart Lowe, Christine Macmillan, Julianne Wilcox and Layne Wright. Organizers say it is about to get a lot bigger.

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the NBC News Science Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with NBCNews.com's stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

NASA file

A fish-eye view of the International Space Station from July 2011 shows the $2 billion Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) in the foreground. A Russian Progress cargo ship and a Soyuz crew capsule are docked on the left end of the station. The structure extending to the left of the AMS is a thermal radiator. Off to the right, the shuttle Atlantis is docked to the station's Tranquility module.

Scientists say a $2 billion antimatter-hunting experiment on the International Space Station has detected its first hints of dark matter, the mysterious stuff that makes up almost a quarter of the universe.

The evidence from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, revealed Wednesday at Europe's CERN particle physics lab, is based on an excess in the cosmic production of anti-electrons, also known as positrons. The AMS research team can't yet rule out other explanations for the excess, but the fresh findings provide the best clues yet as to the nature of dark matter.

"Over the coming months, AMS will be able to tell us conclusively whether these positrons are a signal for dark matter, or whether they have some other origin," Samuel Ting, an astrophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who leads the international AMS collaboration, said in a CERN news release.

The results have been published in Physical Review Letters and were discussed during a NASA news conference.

Dark matter is so named because it hasn't been detected directly through electromagnetic emissions, but primarily through its gravitational effect. Precise measurements of the movements of galaxies and galaxy clusters, as well as studies of the big bang's afterglow, indicate that it accounts for 22.7 percent of the universe's content. Another mysterious factor known as dark energy makes up 72.8 percent, leaving just 4.5 percent for ordinary matter.

Scientists have theorized that ultra-high-energy collisions involving dark matter particles could produce more positrons than expected. The best places to detect such collisions are in huge underground experiments such as CERN's Large Hadron Collider — or in outer space, where cosmic rays can be measured more easily than they are on Earth. 

The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer is the most sensitive cosmic-ray detector ever put into orbit. Researchers from 16 countries worked for well more than a decade to get AMS ready for the space station, but it literally took an act of Congress to get the extra money needed for the launch. The bus-sized device was brought up on the shuttle Endeavour and installed in 2011, during the shuttle fleet's second-last mission. 

Since then, readings from the AMS have been flowing in to Ting and his colleagues for analysis. CERN said the results announced on Wednesday are based on 25 billion recorded events, including 400,000 positrons with energies between 500 million electron volts and 350 billion electron volts. "This represents the largest collection of antimatter particles recorded in space," CERN said.

Researchers noticed an increase in the fraction of positrons detected in the range of 10 billion to 250 billion electron volts. They said the data showed no significant variation over time, or any preferred incoming direction. All this is consistent with the annihilation of dark matter particles in space.

CERN

This chart compares the results from AMS on positron emissions with results from other experiments. AMS measurements at different energy levels are represented by the red dots with error bars.

Other experiments have recorded similar increases in positron production, but AMS was able to chart the rise in unprecedented detail. Ting compared the resolution to seeing something with the naked eye vs. an electron microscope. "It is these fine features that are the difference between us and the rest of the experiments," he told reporters.

Further evidence is needed, however: It's possible that the bump in positrons could be created by emissions from pulsars spread across the galactic plane. The most promising hypothesis suggests that dark matter is part of a yet-to-be-detected array of "supersymmetric" particles, and if that concept is correct, researchers should see a sharp drop in the positron emissions at energies higher than 250 billion electron volts.

Ting said there's not yet enough data to render a decision about such a drop-off. "We want to know how quickly it drops off, how sharp is the drop-off," he told NBC News. "It's the way it drops off that tells you whether it's dark matter collisions, or from pulsars." 

He pointed out that the newly released findings are based on just 10 percent of the data AMS is expected to collect.

"When you take a new precision instrument into a new regime, you tend to see many new results, and we hope this this will be the first of many," Ting said. "AMS is the first experiment to measure to 1 percent accuracy in space. It is this level of precision that will allow us to tell whether our current positron observation has a dark matter or pulsar origin."

Future revelations are expected to come from AMS as well as from the Large Hadron Collider and other underground laboratories.

"The AMS result is a great example of the complementarity of experiments on Earth and in space,” CERN Director General Rolf Heuer said in Wednesday's statement. “Working in tandem, I think we can be confident of a resolution to the dark matter enigma sometime in the next few years."

Update for 4:40 p.m. ET April 3: One of the experiments that could make a direct detection of dark matter particles in the months ahead is the Large Underground Xenon Experiment. LUX is located in an old gold mine, almost a mile deep in the Black Hills of South Dakota. The project's scientists will keep watch for telltale interactions between dark matter and the xenon in their detector. In an emailed statement, LUX co-spokesperson Richard Gaitskell, a physicist at Brown University, hailed the AMS results but said that questions remain:

"Obviously it’s a fantastic new instrument. It’s considerably more sensitive than anything we’ve previously flown as far as looking for antiparticles. So it’s a tremendous step forward.

"The results themselves are consistent with a flux of antiparticles that come from dark matter. On the downside, no aspect of the data that’s been discussed so far allows one to differentiate between an explanation that these antiparticles are coming from dark matter or from another astrophysical source.

"What we see is that at the higher-energy regime that the detector, there is a significant increase in the positron flux. That’s interesting, but it’s been recorded by previous instruments. What we were hoping to see was some additional structure. We’d like to see a bump that has some upper energy threshold or edge, rather just a rise at higher energies. Right now, the new data from AMS does not provide a definitive indication of an upper edge. We’d like to see something like that as direct evidence of dark matter."

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden issued a statement that focusing on the roles played by the space agency and the International Space Station. " I am confident that this is only the first of many scientific discoveries enabled by the station that will change our understanding of the universe," Bolden said. "Multiple NASA human spaceflight centers around the country played important roles in this work, and we look forward to many more exciting results from AMS."

More about dark matter:

• How to catch a dark matter particle
• Dark matter finding thrown into question
• Why dark matter matters

To watch the full NASA news conference, click to the 48-minute mark in this Ustream recording.

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

ESA

This all-sky map from the Planck probe charts the imprint of the big bang's cosmic afterglow.

The Planck cosmology probe has forced scientists to revise their estimates of the universe's age and the cosmic balance of matter and dark energy — and now it's led a physicist to remix the sound of the big bang as well.

The new big-bang sound was created over the weekend by John Cramer, a professor emeritus of physics at the University of Washington. The audio file follows up on Cramer's decade-old audio rendition of the big bang, which was based on data from NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, or WMAP.

Planck and WMAP both charted subtle variations in the all-sky cosmic microwave background, a super-faint glow of stretched-out radiation from a time when the universe was 380,000 years old. The variations amount to mere millionths of a degree in temperature, but they record the imprint of fluctuations left behind by the big bang.

Cramer released his original WMAP big-bang sound 10 years ago, but the Planck readings were so much better that a remix was in order.

"The new frequency spectrum goes to much higher frequencies than did the WMAP analysis, and therefore offers a more 'high-fidelity' rendition of the Sound of the Big Bang," Cramer explained on a Web page providing the updated sound files. We're featuring the 20-second version, but you can download versions that play out for as long as 500 seconds.

"I recommend the 100-second version, but you can choose for yourself," Cramer said.

The sound follows the curves in Planck data to reflect the propagation of pressure waves through the medium of the early universe during the first 760,000 years of its evolution. The time scale has been speeded up astronomically, of course, and Cramer figures that the frequency has been scaled up by a factor of 100 septillion (that's a 1 followed by 26 zeroes).

"The actual Big Bang frequencies, which had wavelengths on the order of a fraction of the size of the universe, were far too low to be heard by humans (even had any been around)," Cramer explained.

Ten years ago, Cramer said that when he played the sound of the WMAP data on his computer, his dogs pricked up their ears and listened attentively. "There was less reaction from the dogs this time, but there was some barking when the big bang sound initially came on," Cramer told NBC News in an email.

Sharp-eared listeners with a good sound system will notice that the Planck remix doesn't rattle the speakers as much as the WMAP original does. "The big bang sound is different because of the higher frequency components from Planck, and because I decided to shift the frequency scale factor to make less bass (since not everyone has a sub-woofer on their PC)," Cramer said.

In addition to the big-bang sound, Cramer has several unorthodox claims to scientific fame, including his long-running column for Analog magazine; his science-fiction novels, "Twistor" and "Einstein's Bridge"; and his experiment to find out whether quantum mechanics would allow for backward causality.

Cramer said his retrocausality experiment is currently in limbo. He has always said that there might be some subtle quantum effect that would rule out backward causality, and so far that's been the case.

"The Mark II version of the retrocausality experiment has concluded for now, defeated by detector noise," he said in his email. "I'm currently in the process of writing a new pre-proposal (to a government organization I won't name) seeking funding for a Mark III version of the experiment.  It would use noise-free superconducting-transition single photon detectors instead of the too-noisy avalanche photodiodes, would be down-scaled in wavelength a bit so that the entangled photon pairs would be at wavelengths matching the communication industry standard wavelengths for fiber optics, and would use two switched single-mode fiber optic Mach-Zehnder interferometers instead of lenses, prisms and mirrors on an optics table.  Said organization is interested because there is the possibility of zero-time-delay communication with distant space missions."

Read that last sentence again: Someone in the government is interested in zero-time-delay communication with distant space missions. Albert Einstein's theories suggest that information can't be transmitted any faster than the speed of light, but Einstein himself said quantum mechanics might open the door for "spooky action at a distance." Zero-time-delay communication certainly sounds spooky — but is it possible? Stay tuned.

Scott Eklund / Seattle P-I file

University of Washington physicist John Cramer, seen here in a 2007 photo, has been working on a laser experiment to test whether causality can work backward in time.

More weird physics:

• Math twisted for faster-than-light travel
• Bizarre quantum physics may play role in life
• New view: Big bang was a big crystallization

Audio clips: Copyright 2013 John G. Cramer.

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

ESA

The Planck mission has produced the most detailed all-sky map of the cosmic microwave background radiation.

The European-led team behind the Planck cosmology probe on Thursday released the mission's first all-sky map of the cosmic microwave background — a post-big-bang "baby picture" that suggests our universe is about 100 million years older than scientists thought.

The map traces subtle fluctuations in temperature that were imprinted on the deep sky when the cosmos was just 370,000 years old. Scientists say the imprint reflects ripples that arose as early as the first nonillionth of a second of the universe's existence. These ripples are thought to have given rise to today's vast cosmic web of galaxy clusters and dark matter.

"To a cosmologist, this map is a gold mine of information," University of Cambridge astrophysicist George Efstathiou, a member of the Planck science team, said during a European Space Agency news conference in Paris. He joked that not long ago, cosmologists might have "given up their children" to have such a map in their hands.

The $900 million (€700 million) Planck probe was launched on a European Ariane 5 rocket in 2009, along with the infrared-sensitive Herschel space telescope. Planck produced its first all-sky radiation map in 2010. Since then, scientists have fine-tuned the image to remove the bright emissions from the Milky Way and other foreground sources, leaving only the background radiation.

Two NASA satellites — the Cosmic Background Explorer and the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, also known as COBE and WMAP — produced earlier versions of the baby picture. Those findings determined that the universe is made up of 4.5 percent ordinary matter, 22.7 percent dark matter, and 72.8 percent dark energy. The results also showed that the universe is geometrically "flat" to a margin of error of 0.4 percent, and helped scientists estimate the universe's age at 13.7 billion years.

NASA

Planck's map of the cosmic microwave background has significantly higher resolution than the readings that were made during previous missions such as COBE and WMAP, as shown in this graphic.

Planck can produce cosmological maps with three times the resolution of WMAP, and at least 10 times the temperature sensitivity. As a result, the estimates of the universe's age and composition have undergone some additional fine tuning. Planck's readings indicate that the universe's expansion rate is slower than previously thought — which means the universe is older.

Planck's estimate for the age of the universe is 13.82 billion years.

Martin White, a member of the Planck team from the University of California at Berkeley, told NBC News that Planck's estimate narrowed down the error bars on previous estimates. "In that sense, it's very consistent, but much more precise," he said.

The Planck team's breakdown of the universe's constituents is 4.9 percent ordinary matter, 26.8 percent dark matter and 68.3 percent dark energy, he said. "There's less stuff that we don't understand, by a tiny amount," Efstathiou said. As a result of the shift toward more matter and less dark energy, "an awful lot of people are going to be revising their calculations," White said.

Efstathiou said the Planck data also pointed to some "strange features" in the cosmic microwave background that may point to new frontiers in physics, including an unexplained dip at one point of the power spectrum, and an unusual distribution of large-scale fluctuations that roughly followed the plane of the solar system.

"Why characteristics of the CMB should relate to our solar system is not understood. ... I was explicitly told not to say anything about God in this talk — which I've just violated," Efstathiou said half-jokingly.

ESA

This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One anomaly is an asymmetry in the average temperatures on opposite hemispheres of the sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There is also a cold spot that extends over a patch of sky that is much larger than expected (circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible.

Planck's data set should help scientists do a reality check on many of the hypotheses proposed by cosmologists, including the view that the universe underwent rapid and far-reaching inflation in the first moments of its existence, as well as the claim that there are six or seven spatial dimensions in addition to the three we perceive.

An initial reading of the data appears to favor the simple models for the inflationary big bang, and rule out a lot of the complex models. "We think that they will be facing a dead end," said Krzysztof Gorski, a member of the Planck team from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

ESA Director General Jean-Jacques Dordain noted that so far, the mission has delivered just half of the data it's expected to produce. The rest of the data is scheduled to come out in 2014 and 2015. "Today is not the end of the story," he told reporters. Efstathiou put it another way, paraphrasing one of Arnold Schwarzenegger's best-known catchphrases: "We'll be back."

More about cosmology:

• WMAP scientists unveil their best 'baby picture'
• Japanese string theorists simulate big bang
• Scrunched-up dimensions untangled

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

This story was originally published on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:49 AM EDT

Corbis

An artist's conception visualizes the big bang at the universe's beginning — or could it be the end?

BOSTON — If the "Higgs-like particle" discovered last year is really the long-sought Higgs boson, the bad news is that its mass suggests the universe will end in a fast-spreading bubble of doom. The good news? It'll probably be tens of billions of years before that particular doomsday arrives.

That's one of the weirder twists coming out of the continuing analysis of results from Europe's Large Hadron Collider, which produced the first solid evidence for the existence of the Higgs boson last year. Current theory holds that the Higgs boson plays a role in imparting mass to other fundamental particles. Confirming the discovery of the Higgs would fill in the last blank spot in that theory, known as the Standard Model.

Physicists discussed the state of the Higgs quest in Boston on Monday during the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

So far, the particle that was found at the LHC fits all the requirements for the Higgs boson, but scientists aren't quite ready to confirm that the particle is really, truly the Higgs boson. It could be, say, just the first of multiple particles involved in the process. "The door is still very much open that there's [another] particle that has a role to play, or even more than that," said Christopher Hill, a physicist at Ohio State University who is also deputy physics coordinator for the LHC's Compact Muon Solenoid experiment.

The LHC has just started a two-year shutdown for equipment upgrades — and Howard Gordon, deputy chair of the physics program at Brookhaven National Laboratory, said "it's going to take another few years" after the collider is restarted to confirm definitively that the newfound particle is the Higgs boson.

In the meantime, physicists have tightened their estimates of the particle's mass: Hill said the current estimate from the Compact Muon Solenoid is 125.8 billion electron volts, or 125.8 GeV, plus or minus 0.6 GeV. The figure from the LHC's other Higgs-boson detector, known as ATLAS, is 125.2 GeV, plus or minus 0.7 GeV.

Those figures can be factored into equations that point to the long-term fate of the universe, said Joseph Lykken, a theoretical physicist at Fermilab.

So what's the outlook?

"If you use all the physics that we know now, and we do what we think is a straightforward calculation, it's bad news," Lykken said. "It may be that the universe we live in is inherently unstable. At some point, billions of years from now, it's all going to be wiped out."

He said the parameters for our universe, including the Higgs mass value as well as the mass of another subatomic particle known as the top quark, suggest that we're just at the edge of stability, in a "metastable" state. Physicists have been contemplating such a possibility for more than 30 years. Back in 1982, physicists Michael Turner and Frank Wilczek wrote in Nature that "without warning, a bubble of true vacuum could nucleate somewhere in the universe and move outwards at the speed of light, and before we realized what swept by us our protons would decay away."

Lykken put it slightly differently: "The universe wants to be in a different state, so eventually to realize that, a little bubble of what you might think of as an alternate universe will appear somewhere, and it will spread out and destroy us."

That alternate universe would be "much more boring," Lykken said. Which led him to ask a philosophical question: "Why do we live in a universe that's just on the edge of stability?" He wondered whether a universe has to be near the danger zone to produce galaxies, stars, planets ... and life.

Even Hill found it interesting that the parameters of particle physics put our universe right along the critical line. "That's something new, which we didn't know before, and which leads some of us to that there's something else coming," Hill said.

When Hill referred to "something else," he was talking about new discoveries in physics — not the end of the world. Lykken emphasized that it would be at least tens of billions of years before vacuum instability took hold.

"To get the exact number, we need more funding," he joked.

More about the fate of the universe:

• A bleak and lonely outlook for the universe
• Will time end in 3.7 billion years? Maybe, or maybe not
• Flash interactive: Beyond the big bang

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss has taken on plenty of edgy topics, ranging from evolution to the state of science policy, to quantum quackery, to the science of "Star Trek." But in his latest book, he takes on what might be the edgiest topic of all: how all the somethingness of our universe could have arisen from nothingness without divine intervention.

The argument that God had to be the "unmoved mover," sparking the cosmos into existence, goes back to Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. In his debates with theologians, "the question 'why is there something rather than nothing' always comes up as the one 'indefensible' issue that implies there must be a creator," Krauss told me over the weekend.

"We've come so far, that addressing that question — or at least addressing similar questions — has become a part of science," said Krauss, who heads the Origins Project at Arizona State University.

He addressed the question in a lecture that was videotaped at an Athiest Alliance International conference in 2009, and the video has been viewed more than a million times on YouTube since then. The video prompted Krauss to write his newly published book on the subject, "A Universe From Nothing."

Why is there something rather than nothing? Krauss said that question implies a search for purpose that really doesn't mesh with scientific inquiry. "The 'why' question is never really a 'why' question ... really, when we say 'why,' we mean 'how,'" he told me.

OK, so how can you get a cosmos from nothing? Krauss traces a series of discoveries building up from Einstein's general theory of relativity to the latest studies of dark energy, explaining how scientists have determined that empty space is seething with energy in the form of virtual particles. From the perspective of quantum physics, particles are popping into and out of existence all the time. The way Krauss and many other theorists see it, nothingness is so unstable that it has to give rise to something ... in our case, the universe as we know it.

What's more, Krauss and his colleagues are coming around to the view that there could be a countless succession of big bangs, creating many universes with different parameters and laws of physics. Some of the universes in this multiverse fizzle back into nothingness immediately, while others — such as ours — hang around long enough to spawn galaxies and stars, planets and life. Scientists haven't yet figured out a way to test this hypothesis, but it would explain how we're lucky enough to live in a long-lasting universe: We just happened to win the prize of existence in a cosmic lottery.

"Some people say, 'Well, that's just a cop-out,'" Krauss acknowledged. "But it's actually less of a cop-out than God."

Positives and negatives
Krauss' book isn't the only one to claim that God's not needed for the creation of the universe. British physicist Stephen Hawking, a good friend of Krauss', made a similar point in his own most recent book, "The Grand Design." A key point in the argument is that the positive energy bound up in matter is balanced by negative gravitational-field energy. From the quantum perspective, the total energy of the universe is pretty much zero. Thus, the energy of "nothingness" is conserved, even when somethingness enters the picture.

This idea of positive and negative energy balancing out at zero has sparked criticism from the creationist side of the fence, but Krauss said the concept fits with current cosmological theories.

NASA / WMAP Science Team

This graphic traces the evolution of the universe from the big bang (at left) to the present, based on data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (far right). So what gave rise to the big bang? Theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says addressing such questions "has become a part of science."

"It sounds like a scam," he told me. "It isn't a scam. Once you allow gravity, the amazing thing is that you can start out with zero energy and end up with lots of stuff, and that stuff can have positive energy, as long as you counteract it with negative energy. Gravity allows energy to be negative. I liken it to the difference between a very savvy stockbroker and an embezzler. The savvy stockbroker will buy on margin, and buy more stuff than they actually have money to account for. But as long as the stock goes up and they sell it in the end, no one knows the difference and everyone's happy — whereas the embezzler takes the money and of course is discovered. The universe is more like the savvy stockbroker."

In the ultra-long term, when all the galaxies have spread out in our expanding universe, and all the stars have died out, the positives and negatives cancel each other out, turning our universe back into the uniformity of empty space. "The 'somethingness' may be here for just a short time," Krauss said.

Accentuate the positive
For a lot of people, all this might sound positively soul-killing. Evolutionary biologist (and crusading atheist) Richard Dawkins says as much in his afterword to Krauss' book: "If you think that's bleak and cheerless, too bad. Reality doesn't owe us comfort."

But Krauss said he doesn't intend the book to be a downer.

"My goal is not to destroy religion, though in fact that would be an interesting side effect," he said. "It's not any more my goal than it was Charles Darwin's goal with his book ["On the Origin of Species"]. My goal is to use the hook of this fascinating question, whiich everyone asks, to motivate people to learn about the real universe." 

Krauss said a scientific perspective on the origins and the fate of the universe offers a valid alternative to the solace traditionally provided by religion.

Free Press

"A Universe From Nothing" aims to explain how something can come from nothingness in accord with the laws of physics.

"Here are these remarkable laws of nature that have arisen and produced what you never would have expected, something much more interesting than any fairy tale," Krauss said. "We are the lucky beneficiaries of that, and we should enjoy the remarkable fact that we have a consciousness that can appreciate this remarkable universe. If it's a remarkable accident, how lucky are we to be a part of it! I do think you can create a 'theology' around this if you want."

Krauss doesn't mean "theology" in the literal sense of the study of God's ways, of course, but rather in the sense of an attitude toward life and its meaning (or meaninglessness). What's your attitude? Feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

Update for 1 a.m. ET Jan. 11: I should make clear that neither Krauss nor any scientist claims to have "the answer" as to the origin of the cosmos. Theorists are just trying to figure out the possible answers to the deepest questions about the universe. Perhaps the most "remarkable" thing about all this — to borrow one of Krauss' favorite words — is that it's actually plausible for scientists to address these questions at all. (And in case you're wondering, the answer to the ultimate question is still 42.)

More about cosmic perspectives:

• Stephen Hawking says God's not needed. So?
• Richard Dawkins puts 'Magic' on a tablet
• Celebrating the spirit of Carl Sagan
• Flash interactive: Beyond the Big Bang
• Hidden universes revealed
• Cosmic Log archive on science and religion

Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.