
Sayyid Azim / AP file
Scientist's at work in the National Museum of Kenya in Nairobi in 2007. As this African nation prepared to unveil 'Turkana Boy' more than two decades after his discovery, his first public outing created a storm.
By Tia Ghose
LiveScience
"Turkana Boy," an exquisitely preserved 1.5-million-year-old human ancestor found in Kenya, may not have had dwarfism or scoliosis, new research suggests.
Past studies had suggested that the ancient human ancestor, a Homo erectus, had suffered from a congenital bone disorder that made him unrepresentative of his species.
"Until now, the Turkana Boy was always thought to be pathological," said study co-author Martin Häusler, a physician and physical anthropologist at the University of Zurich. "The spine was somewhat weird, and so he couldn't be used as a comparative model for Homo erectus biology because he was so pathological."
But the new analysis, published in the March issue of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, suggests that apart from a herniated disc in his back, Turkana Boy was a fairly healthy person with no genetic bone problems. [The 9 Most Bizarre Medical Conditions]
Exquisite find
The exquisitely preserved fossil, unearthed near the shores of Lake Turkana in Kenya in 1984, is the most complete early human skeleton ever found. The ancient hominid was likely a child or an adolescent Homo erectus who lived and died about 1.5 million years ago.
But about a decade ago, researchers proposed that Turkana Boy was suffering from a congenital deformation of the spine —possibly dwarfism or scoliosis.
To find out, Häusler and his colleagues carefully reanalyzed the skeletal bones. When they arranged the ribs as they were originally laid out, they got an asymmetrical back and rib cage.
"The ribs were arranged in the wrong way originally, and then you get this asymmetry, which is essentially not there," Häusler told LiveScience.
By rearranging the bones, the researchers found that Turkana Boy actually had a symmetrical spine and rib cage, meaning he wasn't suffering from dwarfism or scoliosis. As a result, it's fair game to make conclusions about the species' anatomy based on the skeleton, Häusler said.
The ancient hominid did show evidence of some vertebral misalignment, consistent with having a herniated disc — an injury that may have contributed to his death, Häusler said.
Controversial results
The new study is an excellent analysis, wrote Henry McHenry, an anthropologist at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in the study. Häusler "has a special perspective in being an orthopedic surgeon with years of experience with original fossils in Africa and huge collections of modern humans and apes."
But not everyone is convinced.
"His axial skeleton is distinctive and bears evidence of some significant pathology," wrote Scott Simpson, an anthropologist at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio who was not involved in the study, in an email. "Clearly, some of the characteristics recognized in (Turkana Boy) would be characterized as congenital pathologies, perhaps in addition to traumatic injuries."
Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter @tiaghose. Follow LiveScience @livescience, Facebook and Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com
- 8 Grisly Archaeological Discoveries
- Top 10 Mysteries of the First Humans
- Image Gallery: Our Closest Human Ancestor
Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Nope, can't be. The Earth is only 6,000 years old. This is just another of God's little jokes on science.
What a kidder.
We have the fossils... We Win!
Fossils were made by the devil. ;-)
Haha I was beaten to the punch. I was gonna say he can't be 1.5 million years old, Ken Hamm and the creationist museum says that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Remember what Georgia Purdom says: "If the science doesn't point to god, then you are simply doing the science wrong"...
Some evil atheist manufactured that fossil in his basement. We all know that Adam was made on day 6, Eve came from his rib, then their sons @!$%#ed their mother to make all the people we see now...
Nice to see the right wing religious nuts cherry picking facts so that they can live in total denial as usual. They are paranoid delusionals totally detached from reality.
Nice picture? 1984, most complete yet, comming soon?
Of course the Christians think the world is only 6000 years old. Because the Buybull tells them so.
I'll sleep easier tonight knowing that Turkana Boy was not suffering from a pathology after all. Scientists (way, way back in 1984) just arranged his ribs incorrectly, but fortunately a new generation of scientists (presumably just enough smarter thanks to several decades of evolution) have come along and arranged the bones correctly. Poof! Turkana Boy is representative of the Homo erectus species after all. I wonder what this helps them "prove."
Bam! Chalk another one up for science. It matters little (not at all actually) that scientists got it wrong back in 1984. How could they have known (with all those tiny bone fragments) that poor Turkana Boy was suffering from a herniated disk and not dwarfism or scoliosis, or whatever? Or whatever, I ask? Give science the benefit of every and any doubt. Being a Christian, I looked in the Bible to see just exactly where it says the earth is 6,000 years old. You know, I couldn't find that passage anywhere. How is it that non-Christians know how I old I think the world is? I haven't even formulated an opinion on that one, but I have a new opinion about adherents of Scientism: the world must be older than 6,000 years for that much hubris to have evolved.
I agree Lumpy!
Some evil atheist manufactured that fossil in his basement. We all know that Adam was made on day 6, Eve came from his rib, then their sons @!$%#ed their mother which started the family tree of all we see today.
The Bible doesn't say that Earth is 6000 years old but Biblical scholars determined some time ago based on Biblical references that Earth began in 4004 BC. That starting point is pointed to widely by the right wing nuts in politics who are trying to deny the science community
His father was Encino Man.
I do find it odd that they confidently proclaimed pathology when they really didn't know what they were doing. In the whole scheme of things, we're probably still in the middle ages when it comes to medical knowledge.
Nice picture of the boy. Is he the one in the grey shirt or the one in the white shirt? Once again, another crappy job of reporting from NBC!
1.5 million years old?! HAHAHAHAAHAhahahahahaha Oh boy