Sure they grow close -- but plant sex in space is tough

University of Montreal

A pollen grain extending a pollen tube.

By Stephanie Pappas
LiveScience

A real-time look at plant sex in an environment simulating microgravity reveals that agriculture in space might face challenges.

The study also illuminates how gravity works on intercellular transport, a crucial process for mating plants and communicating human brain cells alike.

There's no word yet, however, on how human sex in space would work out — though that may have to change if a private plan to send a married couple on a journey around Mars pans out. 

Sex in space
Though not as titillating as humans getting busy, plant sex is a great way to examine how cells transport materials inside their walls. When a pollen grain lands on a stigma, the female part of a flowering plant, it grows a pollen tube that acts as a tunnel for sperm cells to travel down to reach the egg. The pollen tube is the fastest-growing cell in the plant kingdom. [50 Sultry Facts About Sex]

Fast growth is key for studying the way cells move in real-time. Using any other plant cell, you'd have to wait weeks to see a response to gravity, said study researcher Anja Geitmann, a biologist at the University of Montreal. In pollen tubes, a response takes mere seconds.

University of Montreal

The testing facilities at the European Space Agency (ESA).

Pollen tubes are also good models in which to examine how intercellular transport works, because they don't sense gravity. Any response pollen tubes have is due only to the physical effects of the gravitational force, not the cell sensing gravity and changing its behavior accordingly.

Some plant cells do sense gravity; tiny structures called statoliths in root cells ensure that plant roots grow down, for example. But growth of pollen tubes follows the chemical signal from a female plant, so they don't need gravitational information. In that way, they work like any cell with a nucleus, including animal cells.

Beyond 1 g
No pollen tubes were blasted into space in the making of this study. Instead, Geitmann and her co-researchers availed themselves of the tools of the European Space Agency (ESA). They used a spinning centrifuge 26 feet (8 meters) in diameter to expose growing pollen tubes to forces of gravity up to 20 times normal Earth gravity (known as 1 g). They also put pollen tubes in the ESA's Random Positioning Machine, which turns specimens in all directions at a particular speed, essentially canceling out the effects of gravity from each side. This creates conditions that simulate the microgravity of space.

"It's not true zero gravity," Geitmann told LiveScience. "There is continuously 1 g on the sample, but it simply changes direction."

The researchers used microscopy to watch their samples in real-time. The results revealed that while the pollen tube may not sense which way is up, gravity affects it nonetheless. The diameters of the tubes grown in simulated microgravity were 8 percent smaller than a tube grown in 1 g. At five times Earth's gravity, the tubes were 8 percent wider, and at 20 times Earth's gravity, they were 38 percent wider.

University of Montreal

Pollen grains stick to the stigma, the female organ of a plant.

The surface expansion rate of the tubes also dropped 39 percent in the simulated microgravity.

Because forming a pollen tube is essentially a tiny cellular construction project, cells transport little bubbles, or vesicles, of material to build out the cell walls in the direction the tube is growing. The researchers found that the distribution of two of these materials, cellulose and callose, was disrupted in hyper- and microgravity.

"The intercellular trafficking, which occurs in very precisely defined paths in these cells, was affected," Geitmann said. She and her colleagues reported their findings Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE.

Effects of radiation
Animal reproduction isn't similar enough to plant reproduction to draw any conclusions about the result of human sex in space from this study, Geitmann said. Concerns about human reproduction in space include the effects of radiation exposure on a developing fetus as well as unknowns about microgravity, according to a 1996 paper in the journal Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. [Animal Sex Quiz: Test Your Smarts]

But don't shrug off microgravity plant sex just yet. Intercellular transport is important in a variety of human cells, particularly lengthy neurons, Geitmann said. Researchers studying fish brains reported in the journal Advanced Space Research in 2002 that synaptic formation was influenced by microgravity. Anecdotal reports and small studies of astronauts also suggest that cognitive performance declines in space, but individuals varied widely, according to a 2012 report by NASA.

Causes for that decline could range from sleep deprivation and stress to radiation, NASA found, but no one has looked at whether intercellular transport in neurons might play a role, Geitmann said.

"Many neuronal diseases, such as Huntington's or Parkinson's or Alzheimer's, are related to trafficking," she said.

Humans also need to understand plant sex in space should our species ever need to feed itself on long-duration missions or colonies on other planets.

"If we ever want to do agriculture in space, so to say — it's a long-term vision! — then we have to take this into account," Geitmann wrote in an email. "In order to actually do long-term plant cultivation, we have to look for species that can actually reproduce under zero gravity conditions."

Follow Stephanie Pappas @sipappas. Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience, Facebook or Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss this post

"In order to actually do long-term plant cultivation, we have to look for species that can actually reproduce under zero gravity conditions."

OR...you could grow them in a 1g centrifuge, as it would mitigate problems with watering and soil in zero-gee

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:07 PM EDT

ISS 2.0 needs to be rotating sufficiently to simulate 1G via the centrifugal effect (and large enough in diameter to mitigate the Coriolis effect). It should be no surprise that plants and animals evolved to thrive in a 1G environment. Microgravity creates a foreign environment for us, with adaptations that are suboptimal. Bone loss, muscle atrophy and now this...difficult sex. What better reason to move back to 1G?

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:42 AM EDT

I agree that we need a space facility with more than zero-G. But I think we will find that we don't have to go all the way back to 1 G. That is the real reason we need a Moon base, to find out if anything above zero-G will work. The Moon's 1/6th gravity makes a great starting point.

    #2.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:42 AM EDT

    Mark, shouldn't we test this, first, before building a moon base? After all, if 0.167G is insufficient for long-term human habitation, we can't fix it if it is on the moon. Though, we could build an outpost on the moon (for shorter-term stays and to determine the effects of longer-term ones). We're not even sure that 0.38G on Mars is sufficient, yet.

      #2.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:16 PM EDT

      Well, we definitely need a Moon base before a Mars base.

        #2.3 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:06 PM EDT
        Reply

        I, too, would like to see a spinning space station. If for nothing else, just to see how the 'simulated gravity' would feel and how human bodies and plants react to it.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:09 PM EDT

        GA Tony. At the 'furthest out from center' ring, this would be 1G. Further in (towards the center hub), though, we could experiment with 0.38G to simulate Martian gravity and 0.167G to simulate Lunar gravity. At the hub would be microgravity.

        • 2 votes
        #3.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:35 PM EDT

        I understand that, Jay, but it has still not been done in a real world, i.e. real "off-world", environment. It works theoretically, but we still don't know what effects living like this would have on our physiology, bone structure, inner ears, etc.

        Though, if it works, we could have a three level outer layer (or more) for living, essentially anywhere from 90% to 110% G. Maybe you could put the gyms in the higher Gs?

        Though, I think the inner hub would be used for docking. It might be easier to spin the craft at the stations speed than try to catch up to a port on the outer ring.

        • 2 votes
        #3.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:52 PM EDT

        "I think the inner hub would be used for docking"

        Agreed. 2001: A Space Odyssey got that part right. Yes, I am also frustrated that we haven't yet demonstrated a live rotating space station. We could actually test the effects by constructing a 'tin-can hab' attached, by tether, to a counterweight. Both counterweight and hab rotate around a 0G center node. Zubrin proposed this very concept for the transit vehicle to Mars in his Mars Direct proposal back in the mid-'90s. This would be a more cost-effective effort for 'proof of concept' (as opposed to building a massive 2001: A Space Odyssey type space station right off the bat). One thing for sure is that we won't know what, if any, physiological affects there are until we actually try it.

        • 1 vote
        #3.3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:09 PM EDT
        Reply
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.