Why little dogs outlive big dogs

Deanne Fitzmaurice / Science file

Gibson, a Great Dane, can look a pony in the eye — while Zoie, a Chihuahua, can fit into a purse.

By Charles Choi
LiveScience

Big dogs apparently die younger mainly because they age more quickly, researchers say.

These new findings could help unravel the biological links between growth and mortality, the scientists added.

Normally, across species, larger mammals live longer than their smaller counterparts. For instance, elephants can get up to 70 years old in the wild, while house mice reach only 4 years. Puzzlingly, within species, the opposite seems true — in mice, horses and perhaps even humans.


The apparent cost of bigger bodies is especially conspicuous with dogs, a species that people have bred over the millennia to come in an extraordinary range of sizes. The heaviest known dog may have been Zorba, an English mastiff that weighed 343 pounds (155 kilograms), while the smallest dog alive may be Meyzi, a terrier less than a quarter-pound (110 grams) in size.

Large breeds often die young compared with smaller ones, with a 155-pound (70-kilogram) Great Dane having an average life span of about 7 years, while a 9-pound (4-kilogram) toy poodle can expect to live up to 14 years. [The 10 Most Popular Dog Breeds]

To shed light on the possible tradeoffs of large size, researchers analyzed ages at death in 74 breeds, using data from more than 56,000 dogs that visited veterinary teaching hospitals. The researchers focused on why large dogs lived shorter lives on average.

"My main scientific interest is life-history evolution. I'm also a bit of a dog nerd in private life," said researcher Cornelia Kraus, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Göttingen in Germany.

The scientists found that large breeds apparently aged at faster rates. The speed at which the risk of death increased with age was greater with larger breeds than smaller ones. Indeed, among dog breeds, an increase of 4.4 pounds (2 kilograms) in body mass leads to a loss of approximately 1 month of life expectancy.

"Their lives seem to unwind in fast motion," Kraus told LiveScience.

The investigators now want to follow the growth and health histories of a large number of dogs and pinpoint the leading causes of death for large dogs. For instance, bigger canines apparently suffer from cancer more often, which could make sense; large dogs grow more than smaller breeds do, and cancer is rooted in abnormal cell growth.

"This research should be feasible in dogs, since I found that dog people in general seem very open, interested in and interested to contribute to research on their favorite species," Kraus said.

Kraus and her colleagues Samuel Pavard and Daniel Promislow detailed their findings in the April issue of the journal American Naturalist.

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience, Facebook or Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience. All rights reserved.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

Terrible article. Absoutely terrible. No theory of aging was discussed. Not a single one! There are a few out there with American evolutionary biologist George C. Williams' being among the most accepted as the reason why we age: antagonistic pleiotropy or, genes having multiple functions with some being beneficial in youth for instance, (calcium building for bones) but detrimental in age (calcium plaques in arteries).

I could go on.

Let me guess why the article was terrible. Editor: We are /not/ a science journal. Fine. Then can you refrain from wasting my time by attempting to be?

This was bad.

  • 13 votes
#1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 4:18 AM EST

Umm...FTA "Kraus and her colleagues Samuel Pavard and Daniel Promislow detailed their findings in the April issue of the journal American Naturalist."

Just an idea, but maybe they want people who are interested, to buy the magazine to get specifics.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 5:57 AM EST

Why not spend your time reading journals with the factual information you must desire? These articles, quite frankly, are for entertainment purposes, not so much for practical purposes. Articles from this form of media are usually only used as a means to scratch the surface of a subject otherwise it becomes a time consuming piece primarily researched for journal material. If you are looking for a more in-depth piece consider your local college where you can go beyond this article's capacity.

  • 15 votes
#1.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:42 AM EST

consider if the dogs live in a city a big dog would not get much exercise but to a small dog the house would be a large place for running around.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:14 AM EST

Breaking news!

No people taller than 7 feet live past 80, most centenarians are 5ft +.

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:39 AM EST
Comment author avatarBobster-1557895Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

How has Hilary Clinton lasted all these years? Have you seen those tree trunk legs on that pooch? lol

  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:10 AM EST

all dogs are awesome know matter what size

  • 19 votes
#1.6 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:37 AM EST

I was thinking the same thing; right after reading it I thought "I didn't learn anything from this article" and I really wanted too, lol

  • 6 votes
#1.7 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:19 AM EST

@Bobster, I can only image what your ars looks like. Did that make you feel better? PFFT Can't Fix Stupid.

  • 9 votes
#1.8 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:21 AM EST
Comment author avatarBobster-1557895Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Bushie,

Are you gay? You must be. You are fantasizing about another man's a_ss! LMFAO!

Liberals. God love em! LOL!

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:22 PM EST

Having a 9 yr old collie-German shepherd cross of about 75 lbs, I wanted to have information that might help me keep him alive longer. Sure didn't get it here. (info aside from getting him 2-6 miles exercise/day, keeping him trim, giving him soft beds in every room, good food, fish oil caps, etc.)

  • 4 votes
#1.10 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:25 PM EST

Atheist, you must have no indepent thinking ability if you imply that the editor forced you to read the article. Each of us willingly clicks the articles we want to read. So you yourself are to blame for wasting your time.

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:41 PM EST

Rachel, I had a German Shepherd that lived for 13 years. He got a lot of exercise in his prime chasing jackrabbits out in open West Texas fields and I always fed him the best dog food I could find. Near the end he had heart problems and lived with pannus on both corneas; eventually the pannus blinded him even with aggressive treatment. I've had many dogs over the years, but overall he was the best dog I've ever had. I still miss him.

  • 2 votes
#1.12 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:59 PM EST

Lemme guess, little dogs live longer than big dogs because big dogs like to get into big fights and get their tails handed to them...Well, ya dont live long gettin into neighborhood brawls these days...too many dogs with guns

  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 1:43 PM EST

Well, cr@p! I take the time to respond, and my computer ate it!

Rachel, like inMYday, I feed my German Shepherd the best food I can find. I've had several German Shepherds over my lifetime, and an Akita, and a Sheltie. Whole Dog Journal comes out with a dog food list every year that is excellent. I am also very particular about the treats I give my dogs--most are homemade.

And i'ts really important, these days, to avoid any food or treats with even one ingredient from China.

  • 1 vote
#1.14 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 2:08 PM EST

bobster, in case you've ever wondered, it is because of people like you that the GOP is regarded as the "Stupid Party".

  • 4 votes
#1.15 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 2:13 PM EST

We put down our Maggie, a golden ret-yellow lab mix in October. Wonderful dog, she was a large dog and lived to be 15 years old with a lots of love & luck. At 9 she suffered from ITP blood disorder. Most would have put her down then, but 3 blood fusions, a year of prednisone, she made it through. Than Sept 2011, we were told she had osteoporosis in her back leg and a mass in her lung. We took her home, made her comfortable and was told she will tell you when its time and she lasted a year. No chemo, just food we ate, she ate and up until the second to the last day she was going outside up and down 5 steps. My vet was thrilled - she was amazed that she lasted so long. My dog lasted longer than my mother-in-laws tiny dogs at 11.

I think if you love a large dog get a large dog, don't think way into the future whether it lasts 7 years or 15. Dogs & cats give you so much joy that the inevitable should never be part of the equation.

  • 2 votes
#1.16 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 3:34 PM EST

We own 7 dogs:

1. Female Yorkie - 10 lbs. will turn 10 yrs old this month. Owned since a pup (AKC registered pure breed). Still runs around like a maniac & acts like she is only 1 yrs. old.

2. Male Alaskan Malamute - 197 lbs. 31"+ at the withers, 9.5 yrs. old (will be 10 in July). Best dog I've ever owned. Definitely an Alpha male & the leader. (AKC registered pure breed)

He would be considered a giant Mal, though there really isn't any such thing (just comes from the larger bloodlines some breeders use). Very long large frame, huge head/legs/paws. Carries the weight well & doesn't look over weight. Though ideal weight for him would be 150 lbs. - 160 lbs. range.

Unfortunately, he has had hip dysplasia his whole life (since he was 10 months old). The breeder traced it back to my dog's sire & took that sire out of her breeding program back when we first notified her of what we found.

Needless to say now at his age, 9+, the HD keeps him from getting around too well so getting him to loose any weight is impossible.

3. Male Siberian Husky - 75 lbs, 8+ yrs. old (stray we took in back in 2005)

4. Male Great Pyrenees - 115 lbs., 5 yrs. old, 32"+ at the withers, bought as a pup from a large goat farm where the owner breeds Pyrenees on the side for livestock guardians

5. Male Great Pyrenees - 145 lbs., 5 yrs. old, 31"+ at the withers, litter mate of # 4

Planned on only buying 1 but once we put him in the car the brother started to whine & so we had to buy the brother too. I know we're suckers!

Even though they are litter mates they are very different. One is taller/long/lanky & the other more compact/stockier/heavier/ & temperamental.

6. Female Pomeranian - 17 lbs. approx. 4+ years old (stray we took in 3 years ago)

7. Female Chow - 74 lbs., 5 yrs. old. Former clients dog that we took in when she had to find her a new home

All of them except #1 & # 4 could lose some pounds. All are fed great food & very few treats. They just don't get as much exercise as they should.

Our dogs are able to get more exercise if they choose to since we own an all day-all play dog boarding facility & there are always tons of dogs to play with. They're just at that age where they enjoy sleeping more than running around & playing.

I have a friend whose female Malamute lived to be 18 years old (very unusual). I doubt my big guy will make it that long but I hope he is around for a several more years at least. Mals in general, especially 200 lbs. ones, don't usually live much past 12.

Don't let anyone tell you that you can't have very small & very large dogs living together in peace in the same house. Yes, they're are all spoiled house dogs & they run this place. We're at their service.

    #1.17 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 4:40 PM EST

    Humans who are unusually tall have a shorter life expectancy than humans who are average height. A major reason is the fact that their hearts have to work harder to push blood through more miles of arteries and to force blood upwardly a greater distance against gravity. Their hearts just wear out sooner than for the average person. Google it.

    So you yourself are to blame for wasting your time.

    Not true, BW-267706. Just like most of us, Atheist clicked on the article with the expectation that he would learn something from it. There is no way that he could have known beforehand that the article is useless and uninformative. What else can we expect from NBCNews.com except poorly written articles containing trivia? I'd change news sources in the blink of an eye if I could find a good, unbiased, well-written, on-line newspaper.

    ...it is because of people like you that the GOP is regarded as the "Stupid Party".

    Wrong, Gumps. It's the Democratic party that is perceived as being uneducated and ignorant because so many Dems are doing nothing with their lives except sitting on their butts collecting welfare and expecting the government to hold their hands from cradle to coffin.

    • 1 vote
    #1.18 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 4:58 PM EST

    Oh scales, you could have taken the high road there and not gotten nasty, but you just had to, didn't you? You are wrong statistically, but don't let that stop you.

      #1.19 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 6:00 PM EST

      It's the Democratic party that is perceived as being uneducated and ignorant because so many Dems are doing nothing with their lives except sitting on their butts collecting welfare and expecting the government to hold their hands from cradle to coffin.

      And where did you get that notion? Methinks you've been overdosing on Rush Limbaugh.

        #1.20 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:12 PM EST
        Reply

        Do you also write notes to Scientific American criticizing their poor quality coverage of fashion news? This is an outlet for general news, not in depth scientific reporting. I see your comments everywhere on this site and it is always negative. You are giving us atheists a bad name and reputation.

        • 6 votes
        Reply#2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 5:46 AM EST

        Hey Scott,

        SA doesn't report on fashion news. Feel free to attack specific ideas of mine, but general lobs of being uncomfortable or offended are not the typical attributes of those I know who are interested in facts over comfort.

        This article sucked. Perhaps the report coming out in April will be better.

        Lastly, do you have evidence that my comments are giving you a bad reputation? I get private emails all the time from folks thanking me for different points of view. Why are you so worried about me affecting your reputation? Anyone judging you based on my words shouldn't merit one second of your time.

        You write as though you still have residual effects of faith-talk.

        • 2 votes
        #2.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 5:49 AM EST

        Atheist, your statement, "This article sucked. Perhaps the report coming out in April will be better" actually makes Scott's point for him. This article was not *intended* to be better than the April report will be. It's neither a scientific article nor printed in a scientific publication; therefore, sadly, it probably was destined to fail to achieve your stellar standards.

        Maybe if you limit yourself to reading only your beloved "SA," you can become a happier person.

          #2.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 3:49 PM EST
          Reply

          They forgot to mention something incredibly important in this award winning article......big dogs consume more food than small dogs.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 6:19 AM EST

          I just know I am going to regret this but ...... why would the meal portions have a bearing in an article about life span?

          • 1 vote
          #3.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 6:35 AM EST

          I grew up regularly seeing people with German shepherds and Alaskan malamutes that lived 14-20 years. They were fed human food and raw meat that either they killed or their owners gave them. I feed my dogs dog food but I try to give them raw as well and plenty of exercise. My dogs are lab mixed with shepherd and I don't know what her offspring was mixed with. They are mother and son . She is 5 years and he is 4. They are very energetic and have not slowed down one bit.

          • 1 vote
          #3.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:57 AM EST

          I have raised and bred miniature Dachshunds my entire adult life. The average lifespan has bee about 14 - 15 years. By the same token I had a medium sized mixed breed Border Collie and German Shepherd that lived until age 15 and whose health only failed in the last 6 months of her life. Much depends on proper diet and exercise. I have a good friend that had an English Mastiff that lived until age 13 and he lived on 80 acres out in the Arizona desert with plenty of room to run, so I think the article may have been somewhat arbitrary.

          • 6 votes
          #3.3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:14 AM EST

          Ellen, one reason your mixes may live longer and be healthier is that they are genetically diverse.

          • 2 votes
          #3.4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 2:38 PM EST
          Reply

          As the song says, only the good die young. Those annoying little yap-yaps live forever.

          • 16 votes
          Reply#4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 7:38 AM EST

          So the giant yip-yap that kept my whole neighborhood awake until we ran off the owners must have been the exception.

          • 3 votes
          #4.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:14 AM EST

          Haha. Love it!

            #4.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:45 AM EST

            I have one of those annoying little yap-yaps. I prefer her to some annoying humans, especially those who make comments about subjects they know nothing about.

            • 4 votes
            #4.3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:04 AM EST

            I have 2 Chihuahuas, one of the yap-yap breeds. The older one is somewhere between 12-15 and she was a puppy mill breeder for the first 6-9 years of her life. I've had her 6 years and never heard her bark. Two months ago I rescued another Chihuahua and have trained her not to bark. It can be done if the owners have the patience to train them properly.

            My sister has a Maltese and not only is it a yappy dog, it has that high pitched yap that goes right through your head. She has made no attempt to stop her barking so she does it for 10 minutes every time someone comes in the house.

            • 3 votes
            #4.4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:27 AM EST

            F. Schrodinger--I just had to laugh! I prefer big dogs personally, but I had a chihuahua when I was a kid, and absolutely loved her. Her name was Poco, and she was funny and fun! My husband feels about little yippy dogs the way you do, although he is very kind to them when he is around them. We like to tease each other--he says they would make good shark bait. I tell him that when we get to Heaven, God is going to pair him up with Poco, and she will be able to TALK to him! ;)

            Chiluver 1228, my hats off to you for the work you have done with your chihuahuas and bravo for rescuing two deserving K-9's!

            • 2 votes
            #4.5 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 2:19 PM EST

            Chiluvr--you are spot on. If someone doesn't have the time or ability to train the dog to be quiet, then in my opinion you don't need the dog. A tenant in my building snuck a "yappy" dog in despite a "no dogs" policy. Had the dog been quiet, there would have been no complaints and the tenant would still be here. An old man in an adjacent apartment building--same thing. He'd take the dog outside and stand around on the corner and let the dog yap at everything and anything that moved and jump up on passersby, even kids walking home from school. Not cool...

            • 1 vote
            #4.6 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 4:09 PM EST

            Our neighbors have a little yapper and two big deeper yappers who bark every single time we walk out the door. They all three have lived there for years and we have as well, and frankly it is seriously annoyed to be barked as continuously while I am outside. It used to be peaceful here and it's why we bought the place, but not any more...sigh. I love dogs...but there is no reason to keep barking and barking for years.

              #4.7 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 6:05 PM EST
              Reply

              Sort of like humans.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#5 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 7:59 AM EST

              Seems true for humans too I guess, the heavier (i.e. fatter) you are the better chance of dying early as well.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#6 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:04 AM EST

              Different issues. Chances of dying versus so-called rates of aging.

              • 1 vote
              #6.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:12 AM EST

              It is all relevant. Being heavier makes things wear out quicker in your body, you just refer to it as aging. Get it yet?

              • 2 votes
              #6.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:36 AM EST

              "Heavy" is relative to the frame. They weren't comparing overweight animals with healthy weight animals, they were comparing larger breeds with smaller breeds. Big difference. A fat small breed dog would have a higher chance of dying than an fit small breed dog. So what? Not relevant to the article or the study.

              • 3 votes
              #6.3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:44 AM EST

              Everythine is relevant. Being bigger from fat or just frame size still requires more work from your body. That is of course how I see things working in the world. I think this article, and a good look at humans, can show this just might be true.

                #6.4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:21 AM EST

                I don't always agree with atheist, but he is correct here, I think. Rates of aging has more to do with this dog study and that has more to do with genetics, probably. Fitness and nutrition and environment do impact on those genetic potentials.

                TruthComesHere, it seems to me that being overweight would have more'wear-out' potential than a big frame. If you have a big frame, then your bones can bear more muscle weight because they are bigger, and there will be more cartilage, etc., too. There is probably an optimum ratio for humans. And a certain amount of work, weight bearing, and exercise is important in order to keep things working at their optimal.

                Enough-2735007 also makes a good point.

                  #6.5 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 2:39 PM EST
                  Reply

                  "Big dogs apparently die younger mainly because they age more quickly, researchers say."

                  Really? Ya' think? I wonder how much $$$ the researchers received from the gov't for that revelation?

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#7 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:27 AM EST

                  And do you know why? That's what they are researching. It didn't indicate they just discovered that large dogs don't live as long as small ones.

                  • 2 votes
                  #7.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:21 AM EST

                  Linda, at least one of the researchers is at the University of Gottingen in Germany (sorry my computer does not have an 'umlaut' key for the 2 dots above the 'o') and the article does not say who funded the research. For all we know, it could have been funded by a dog food company working through the University, or the university itself if it has a veterinary program. Also, a future discovery about aging in humans could eventually come from this.

                  • 1 vote
                  #7.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 3:14 PM EST
                  Reply

                  It is not the meal portions as much as what is in the meal; if you want a great discussion that is not technical, check out the book "Pukka's Promise" that discusses genetics, food, and other environmental factors that affect longevity.

                    Reply#8 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:37 AM EST

                    I have a 17+ lab mix. And she is fat. I am the lucky one so far.

                    • 7 votes
                    Reply#9 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:49 AM EST

                    Woof

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#10 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:54 AM EST

                    seems to me their conclusion was almost a restatement of the observation. big dogs don't live as long because "The scientists found that large breeds apparently aged at faster rates".

                    I guess one other option was they got disease more often....but I think that would have been common knowledge if true.

                    Next we will find out some trees are higher...because they grow more :)

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#11 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:17 AM EST

                    I have Greyhounds, and they generally live to be 11-12 years old. But Greyhounds, like Great Danes and other long-limbed dogs, are especially succeptible to osteosarcoma (bone cancer). One of our female Greyhounds had to be put down at six years old because of this. All in all though, "greyt" dogs.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#12 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:24 AM EST

                    I have been in greyhounds since 1983 and have found that, as a rule, they live to be 12-13 years. The article made the point that there seems to be a relationship between weight (normal weight for size) and life span. Could it be possible that, although greyhounds are tall 27-30" at shoulder, because they weigh less than other breeds of similar height that they (greyhounds) have a longer life span. Worth investigating, I think. BTW, I am yet to have a grey with osteosarcoma, although I lost one three years ago to cancer of the peritoneum at the age of 10. Greyts rule!

                      #12.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:21 AM EST

                      dizzy, I can only speak from my own experience. Between us and at least three other couples we know with greyhounds, at least four of the dogs have died of osteosarcoma in the last 12-15 years. In one case, the people had the dog's front leg amputated, but he died six months later because the cancer had metastasized into his lungs. Most of the bone-cancer dogs had the cancer in their legs, but one female had it in her rib bones. One of our females also had a disease called Cushing's Sydrome, but with medication, she lived to be 11 1/2. One of our males had a thyroid problem and severe food allergies which we treated, but he died at 10 1/2 after having a seizure that we think might have been a stroke or a vestibular episode. We have also known only one of them that lived more than 12 years. Don't get me wrong. I dearly love the breed and will continue to have greyhounds because they are such loving and calm companions. These are just our personal observations over the years.

                        #12.2 - Fri Mar 8, 2013 11:03 AM EST
                        Reply

                        We could all cite exceptions to the rule (our greyhound lived to 15), but anyone of average intelligence realizes that larger breeds tend to have a shorter life span. Thank goodness we now know it's because they age faster.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#13 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:30 AM EST

                        I have a 10 year old Corgi mix, can anyone suggest what her life expectancy might be? She is healthy and fed properly. My vet declines to give an estimate because she is a rescue dog and the first 2 years of her life are not known. I am enjoying her every day she is with me and I am trying to have her enjoy her life to make up whatever went before.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#14 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:30 AM EST

                        Google 'average lifespan for corgis' and see what comes up. It will depend on what the corgi is mixed with though.

                          #14.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 3:22 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Within any given species, larger size puts added strain on the (evolved) internal organ support systems, so generally speaking this makes the larger members of any species tend to break down faster. Most species have an average size (and average longevity) which they have evolved to, and it is usually only the influence of humans which changes that size from its biological ideal, for better or for worse when it comes to the longevity of individual breeds. - RC

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#15 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:37 AM EST

                          I think I'll pick up a copy of the American Naturalist (April issue), as I am curious to see what the real findings are. As stated, this news clip really doesn't give you a lot of insight..

                          I'd also like to know why some of the larger breeds mature much later than little dogs. We had a lab that was still a big puppy at a year and a half, while our mini poodle (not a yapper, but does let us know when someting is amiss) seemed to mature faster. By "mature", I mean, still chewing on stuff (furniture), knocking people down, dragging you down the sidewalk (even with obedience training), etc. Plus, once they DO mature, is it just downhill from there? Our lab was smart as a whip, but so is our poodle. I expect all dogs to have a puppy spirit, but our lab was super-hyper! Plus, our lab had no idea how big he was, but our poodle knows we're bigger than he is and when other dogs are bigger than he is. Our poodle was a puppy mill rescue, so we don't know much about his first 7 months of life.

                          BTW - We gave our lab to a friend, as we moved to an apartment, at the time, and didn't feel that would be right for a large, active dog. He went to a home with 5 kids, a swimming pool and an acre lake! He lived a long, happy life (no cancer) - 15 years, and was very much loved.

                          • 1 vote
                          #15.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:52 AM EST
                          Reply

                          I have not had one of my dogs die younger than age 16. I have had Boxers, German Shepherds, Border Collies, Belgian Sheepdogs, and a miniature collie that lived to be 19 - all female. They were all fed the dog food of the time and table scraps, and were exercised daily. I have a seven year old black Lab right now who is starting to gray at the muzzle, and he is a male. I will be curious to see if the female dogs live longer than the male.

                            Reply#16 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:48 AM EST

                            Love 'em while you have 'em, no matter how long that may be. They enrich our lives in ways that go far beyond the numbers.

                            • 8 votes
                            Reply#17 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:52 AM EST

                            I agree. My two best friends get all my love including plenty of activity, good nutrition and daily rides to anywhere. I believe, just like humans, dogs that are happy will live much longer and fuller lives.

                            • 3 votes
                            #17.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:48 AM EST
                            Reply

                            Not being a professional dog breeder, I am not sure if this is valid or not, but a friend of mine who keeps large-breed dogs pointed out to me once that to the best of his knowledge, no dog had ever been specifically bred purely for longevity. He went on to point out that dogs are bred to heard, defend, serve, hunt, retrieve, etc., but never for length of life.

                            I don't know if he was correct or not, but it seemed like an interesting avenue of thought, especially given all of the things that dogs are bred for. I'm guessing it might be harder to breed for as well since one would have to observe a dog for a long time relative to, say, being able to train a champion retriever or herder in a couple of years. And if you are breeding for color pattern, confirmation, etc., you also know pretty quickly whether or not you have a "winner" on your hand, versus waiting 10-20 years to know if you had an exceptionally long-living dog vs. its peers.

                              Reply#18 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:54 AM EST

                              At which point it is too late to breed it.

                                #18.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:47 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Get a cat. THEY can live to 30! Mine is 8+ years old and has just as much energy as when he was kitten. Pluses: no drool, no picking up after him and he's nice and warm on my feet.

                                  Reply#19 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:58 AM EST

                                  No, don't get a cat. If you enjoy birds, butterflies, toads, lizards, etc. DON't get a dang cat. They will destroy it ALL. It's their nature.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #19.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:53 AM EST

                                  I enjoy those things, but when they are outside my house, which is why I have 2 indoor cats. They've killed two snakes that got into our house (we have an old stone foundation). My cats are great for keeping my house pest free, and they get along great with my beagle/shepherd/lab mix.

                                    #19.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:26 AM EST

                                    If you spay/neuter your cat and keep them inside, they don't have any opportunity to kill anything.

                                    Of course, if a stray snake, spider, fly or mouse gets inside, then it's fair game.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #19.3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 1:42 PM EST

                                    Re: TheBobs. I had 9 cats for a number of years. The first to die went at 16, the last to die went at 22. So for 22 years I discussed our cats with cat people and our vet. With an acknowledged failing memory, I do not ever remember anyone suggesting that cats with any sort of frequency live to 30 years old. I'm not saying it can't happen, but respectfully suggest that the "typical" maximum age is around 20 yrs old - not 30.

                                      #19.4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 7:29 PM EST
                                      Reply

                                      The average age of a linebacker is 50. I wonder if size could be one factor? How many really large old people do you see?

                                        Reply#20 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:02 AM EST

                                        You're not allowing for shrinkage. I used to be 5'5", but thanks to getting older, I'm now 5' nothing and getting shorter every day! So...I should live to 100, right?

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #20.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 1:45 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        Thank God I can cross this off my bucket list! Whew! One more down. <<insert sarcasm>>

                                        • 2 votes
                                        Reply#21 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:04 AM EST

                                        why start the article title with "why" when you don't even give a single simple idea of why? what a waste of time to read this misleading bleep bleep bleep

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#22 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:06 AM EST

                                        The meek (and the lean) shall inherit the earth.

                                          Reply#23 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:26 AM EST

                                          Had a Chow...lived to be 16 years old...now have a Yellow Lab 12 years old and going strong and a Golden Retriever 8 years old and going strong...put that in your study...

                                            Reply#24 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:33 AM EST

                                            I had a beagle and a yellow lab that both died at the age of 10. The beagle died of an untreatable form of lymphoma, and the lab to skin cancer two years after she died (he was two years younger than her). There are always going to be abberations in a study.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #24.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:29 AM EST

                                            DOGS RULE!!!

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #24.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:26 PM EST
                                            Reply

                                            I don't think it is as simple as smaller outlives larger,I think some breeds of roughly similar size have different lifespan averages. The Great Dane seems to be unusually short lived and/or disease prone. Also some other so-called "giant" breeds like the St. Bernard?

                                            Perhaps the breeds that are close to the size of their ancestors live longest,that would suggest the wolflike dogs tending to live a reasonable long time (for a dog).

                                            Do neighborhood "mongrel" dogs live longer than official "purebreed" dogs? Do country peoples' bred working dogs live longer than fancy bred for the show-ring dogs?

                                              Reply#25 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:37 AM EST

                                              Mongrels are a genetic crap shoot with no predictable results. You may get a winner or you may get a veterinary disaster.

                                              Dog breeding done right screens for health problems and looks to produce sound animals.

                                              The show ring is one of the worse places to look, but in fairness that varies by breed and breeder.

                                              Working dog lines tend to be more physically sound (as in they won't break down) but you can still run into issues with cancer if someone isn't screening for that and trying to breed it out. Again, some breeders are better and more thoughtful than others.

                                              Dog breeding is an art and a science. Get it right and you can reliably produce some fine dogs. Do it wrong and you get opposite. Put another way, you breed best to best, not junk to junk.

                                              The problem is most buyers don't understand how breeding works. They see the cute pup on the tailgate at Wal Mart and buy with little regard for where the dog came from genetically.

                                                #25.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:02 PM EST
                                                Reply
                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.