
ASA, ESA. Acknowledgement: Josh Lake
Nearly 200 000 light-years from Earth, the Large Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, floats in space around our galaxy. As the Milky Way's gravity gently tugs on its neighbor's gas clouds, they collapse to form new stars. In turn, these light up the gas clouds in a kaleidoscope of colors, visible in this image from the Hubble Space Telescope.
By Clara Moskowitz
Space.com
The distance to one of the Milky Way's next-door neighbors, a satellite galaxy that orbits its outskirts, has been determined more accurately than ever before, astronomers announced Wednesday.
The achievement could help scientists calibrate other cosmic distances, which are essential for understanding how quickly the universe is expanding and solving the mystery of dark energy. Dark energy is the name given to whatever is tugging the universe apart and causing its expansion to accelerate.
According to the new measurement, the nearby dwarf galaxy called the Large Magellanic Cloud lies 163,000 light-years away.
"I am very excited because astronomers have been trying for a hundred years to accurately measure the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud, and it has proved to be extremely difficult," Wolfgang Gieren, an astronomer at Chile's Universidad de Concepción, Chile, said in a statement. "Now we have solved this problem by demonstrably having a result accurate to 2 percent."
The finding was nearly a decade in the making, and required repeated precise measurements of rare pairs of binary stars that are oriented so that they eclipse each other as they orbit, from the perspective of Earth. [How Scientists Measured the Large Magellanic Cloud Distance (Video)]

ESO / L. Calcada
This illustration shows an eclipsing binary star system. As the two stars orbit each other, they pass in front of one another and their combined brightness, seen from a distance, decreases. By studying how the light changes, and other system properties, astronomers can measure the distances to eclipsing binaries accurately.
Using telescopes at the European Southern Observatory's La Silla Observatory and the Las Campanas Observatory, both in Chile, Gieren and his colleagues identified eight pairs of eclipsing binaries in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
By tracking the changes in the star pairs' brightness when one star passed in front of the other, and vice versa, as well as measuring the stars' orbital speeds, the scientists could deduce the stars' sizes and masses, as well as details regarding their orbits. With this information, combined with measurements of the stars' total brightness and colors, their precise distances could be determined.
These measurements improve on previous estimates of the Large Magellanic Cloud's distance, which were all based on methods that had inherent uncertainties.
"Because the LMC is close and contains a significant number of different stellar distance indicators, hundreds of distance measurements using it have been recorded over the years," said team member Ian Thompson of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C. "Unfortunately, nearly all the determinations have systemic errors, with each method carrying its own uncertainties."
Pinning down the distance of the LMC, in turn, allows scientists to refine their estimates of other, farther cosmic distances. That's because the measurements of close distances are used to calibrate measurements of far-off objects. The new findings should help astronomers narrow down the Hubble Constant, which denotes the rate of the universe's expansion, and is integral for the study of dark energy.
"We are working to improve our method still further and hope to have a 1 percent LMC distance in a very few years from now," said researcher Dariusz Graczyk. "This has far-reaching consequences not only for cosmology, but for many fields of astrophysics."
The findings are to be detailed in Friday's issue of the journal Nature.
Follow Clara Moskowitz @ClaraMoskowitz and Google+. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.
- 7 Surprising Things About the Universe
- Images: Peering Back to the Big Bang & Early Universe
- Large Magellanic Cloud Region Key To Hubble Contest Win | Video
Copyright 2013 Space.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


What was the old distance we thought it was at?
Exactly what I was going to ask??? Why do they almost never give us any pertinent data.
Take the Kepler, how does what they have found compare with what they expected to find?
I believe it was originally estimated to be around 200,000 light years away. Now closer to 163,000 LY.
Imagine how many "Earths" are there in Milky way and how many more could exist in the neighbouring galaxies. Mind blowing.
Another Earth? Closer Than You Think
I can't remember the name of the calculation (it's named after inventor), anyway that estimates the number of planets that have advanced life on them in our galaxy. The number is around 10,000.
Just remembered the name: Drake equation
The problem with the Drake Equation is that there are still too many unknown variables. It's great as a framework, but lousy for a useful estimate.
Still, progress is being made. We have a much better idea of the values of the first variables (rate of star formation, and the percentage of planets with stars) than we did when I first saw Drakes work many moons ago.
I still say we live in a closed system, finite, curved space Universe, and that the inertial expansion of our Universe has already overtaken the spatial expansion of our Universe, which means that the outer fringes of our Universe are already accelerating back together again, under the old familiar force known as gravity. IMO, the flat Universe theory is destined to one day go where the flat Earth theory has already gone, which is to the trash heap of history. - RC
(Just remember I already told you all so, and I did it eons ago, at least 'relatively' speaking. (To tell you the truth, I am not even sure I am related to anyone in this world anymore.)) - RC
("Turn around, bright eyes". It is fast becoming a "total eclipse of (my) heart"!) - RC