
Frédéric Parrenin
A section of an Antarctic ice core shown under polarized light reveals the individual ice crystals.
By Tia Ghose, LiveScience
Rising carbon dioxide levels may have caused Antarctic warming in the past, new research strongly suggests.
The findings, published Thursday in the journal Science, just add to the body of evidence that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions will lead to climate change.
"It's new evidence from the past of the strong role of CO2 [carbon dioxide] in climate variation," said study co-author Frédéric Parrenin, a climate scientist at the CNRS in France.
Past data
Eons of the Earth's climate history are revealed deep within ice sheets in the Arctic and Antarctic. The Antarctic ice traps gas bubbles from the climate that can reveal what the ancient atmosphere looked like, while the ice itself can reveal historical temperatures.
But gas bubbles from a given period get buried deeper than ice of the same period, making it hard to tie past temperatures with atmospheric changes.
In the past, scientists using older techniques found that increases in carbon dioxide happened after global warming, not the reverse. [Images of Melt: Earth's Vanishing Ice]
Past link
But Parrenin and his colleagues wondered whether that was actually the case. To answer that question, the team looked at five ice cores that had been drilled from Antarctica over the last 30 years.
They focused on ice from 20,000 to 10,000 years ago, which encompassed the last period when the planet warmed naturally and glaciers melted.
The team measured the concentration of nitrogen-15 isotopes, or atoms of the same element with different weights, at different depths throughout the ice cores. They compared the depth of that isotope with the ice composition for all the cores to determine the distance between ice bubbles and ice from the same period.
Global warming
The team found that global warming and a carbon dioxide increase happened at virtually the same time — between 18,000 and 11,000 years ago.
"It makes it possible that CO2 was the cause — at least partly — of the temperature increase during the courses of the last glaciation," Parrenin told LiveScience.
And if increased carbon dioxide could lead to rising temperatures in the past, it also can in the present day, he said.
The findings may deflate some climate skeptics, who used the poor dating of ice cores to question the link between carbon dioxide and warming, said Robert Mulvaney, a glaciologist with the British Antarctic Survey, who was not involved in the study.
It also confirmed the view of most climate scientists that in the past, rising temperatures and carbon dioxide were locked in a feedback loop, where high temperatures led to more carbon dioxide being released from the deep oceans, which increased temperatures further, Mulvaney said.
But because predictions of future warming are based on recent carbon dioxide and temperature data, not historical models, "it hasn't really changed anything about our understanding of how climate change will change our modern environment." Mulvaney told LiveScience.
Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter @tiaghoseor LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+.
- Image Gallery: One-of-a-Kind Places on Earth
- The Reality of Climate Change: 10 Myths Busted
- 8 Ways Global Warming Is Already Changing the World
Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


If there is a positive feedback, which there almost certainly is, then it doesn't really matter whether the cycle was started by temperature rise or CO2 rise. Both will be inevitable.
But don't you know if it occurred before, then we can't possibly be responsible for it now? /s
I wish that was true AG99 but it isn't. There are natural carbon cycles that recycle it but humans are just adding carbon without taking away any.
Still leaving out the reflection factor, I am assuming, and toss in it still isn't modled using historical data, makes me think it is still hysterical data. They still don't factor in the fact that the sun is hotter as well. If he is going to fix climate change, Obama better be the messiah.
So lets throw trillions of dollars at fixing global warming, to watch Mother Nature Biotch slap us right to where she will put us anyway. No this story doesn't worry the detractors, we are still waiting for the warmers to get it right.
The reflection factor? Do you mean albedo? Of course that is considered. But that just increases the positive feedback; when ice melts,less light is reflected and further warming occurs.
And of course they have considered changes in solar output. That is one piece of evidence for AGW, because the changes in solar output simply cannot account for the observed climate changes.