Kepler probe discovers an alien planet that's smaller than Mercury

NASA / Ames / JPL-Caltech

An artist's conception shows the planet Kepler-37b. This planet is slightly larger than our own moon and orbits its host star every 13 days. Its surface temperature is probably around 427 degrees Celsius (800 degrees Fahrenheit).

The discovery of a strange new world about the size of Earth's moon has shattered the record for the smallest known alien planet, scientists say.

The newfound alien planet Kepler-37b is the first exoplanet discovered to be smaller than Mercury. It whips around its parent star every 13 days and has a roasting surface temperature of about 800 degrees Fahrenheit (427 degrees Celsius), researchers said. It not a promising contender for life, they added.


Astronomers found Kepler-37b and two other, larger planets (called Kepler-37c and Kepler-37d) orbiting a star about 215 light-years from Earth using NASA's prolific Kepler space telescope. Finding such a small exoplanet with the Kepler spacecraft was a stretch, but some attributes of Kepler-37b's parent star made the discovery possible.

The star has few sunspots and is bright relative to its planet, making it easier for the Kepler spacecraft to spot the telltale dimming that takes place when a planet passes in front of its star, which scientists call a transit. That method revealed not just the presence of Kepler-37b, but two siblings traveling in orbits farther from the parent star. [Gallery: The Smallest Alien Planets]

"There are not many signals masking the transit," study leader Thomas Barclay of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., told Space.com. "What makes this exceptional was [that] this dip of brightness was just 22 parts per million."

Too hot to host life
Kepler-37b and its siblings, 37c and 37d, are probably uninhabitable, scientists said. All three planets lie close to their parent star, well inside the Earth-sun distance (called astronomical units, or AU). One astronomical unit is about 93 million miles (150 million kilometers).

The moon-sized Kepler-37b is so close to its parent star, at just 0.10 AU, that it probably has no atmosphere or liquid water on its surface. The next planet out, Kepler-37c, is slightly smaller than Earth and may have an atmosphere, but it orbits the star at 0.14 AU — a location that's not in the star's habitable zone, where liquid water could exist on the surface.

NASA / Ames / JPL-Caltech

As shown in this comparative graphic, two of the three planets orbiting Kepler-37 are smaller than Earth, while the third is twice Earth's size. Kepler-37b is about 80 percent the size of Mercury,

The biggest planet in the newfound alien solar system is Kepler-37d. It is about twice the size of Earth and orbits the parent star at a distance of 0.2 AU.

"This could hold an atmosphere, but it's unlikely to be a rocky planet — more likely to be gassy — simply because of its size. It could hold some kind of liquid at the surface," Barclay said.

The next step, Barclay added, will be to look for Mercury-sized exoplanets at greater distances from the host star Kepler-37. More planets could be orbiting the star and await discovery.

"We're looking at it very carefully," Barclay said. "There's nothing yet, but something may appear in the data."

Starlight tells the tale
Barclay and his team took great care to confirm the existence of planets around Kepler-37. The researchers knew that a dip in the star's brightness identified by the Kepler spacecraft could have come from several types of sources, including another star that might be passing in front of the Kepler-37 target. So they ran a computer simulation to see if the newfound planet candidates could be false positives.

Using a tool called Blender from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the researchers simulated several false positive scenarios in order to eliminate them. The results made researchers more than 99 percent confident that the planet candidates are actual planets, Barclay said.

More about planets from Cosmic Log

The science team managed to obtain a close approximation of the size of the Kepler-37 star, in addition to spotting its planetary retinue. The star's quiescent nature allowed the researchers to measure it with asteroseismology, a technique that uses acoustic oscillations on the star's surface. The method is similar to how researchers probe the Earth's interior with seismic devices during earthquakes.

The uncertainty for a star's size is typically 20 to 30 percent, Barclay said. In this case, using asteroseismology, the researchers narrowed the uncertainty to 3 percent.

Measurements showed that Kepler-37 is about 75 percent the size of Earth's sun and 80 percent as massive. This places the star within the same stellar class as our sun.

The $600 million Kepler mission launched in March 2009, and has found more than 2,740 candidate planets so far. The spacecraft searches for small dips in stars' light caused by orbiting worlds that pass in front of them periodically, dimming their brightness.

Follow Elizabeth Howell @howellspace, or Space.com @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook and Google+.

© 2013 Space.com. All rights reserved. More from Space.com.

Discuss this post

I miss Pluto.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:00 PM EST

It's still there. No one moved it.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:12 PM EST

I miss Uranus....

    #1.2 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:37 PM EST
    Reply

    I miss Walt.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:06 PM EST

    2,740 planets in less than four years is pretty darn good.

    Still waiting on that colony ship, though...

    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:07 PM EST

    The next generation of research satellites like Kepler should be able to scan even more of the sky, possibly finding closer and more earthlike planets. The next generation after that may include instruments that use spectroscopy to determine the atmosphere. After that, it may be possible to build telescopes to actually see the planet. What happens if we see cities? All of these planets are going to be dozens if not hundreds of light years away. Guess that particular find will eventually put some money into NASA and some research in FTL drives. Looks like it may be possible, but not in my lifetime. <sigh>

    • 3 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:13 PM EST

    They'd have to be pretty massive cities for us to see them from that distance, even allowing for future telescope technology.

    Neat to think about, but incredibly unlikely, even if there IS alien life out there.

      #4.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:00 PM EST
      Reply

      While small exoplanets are interesting, playing devil's advocate, so what? We can't go there, either as human exploration, nor as robotic. The distances are too great and the technology too primitive to really explore something even 20 light years away. Until near light speed rockets are is use, I will continue to believe and hope for life elsewhere. I'll just have to live with the fact that it won't be confirmed in my lifetime. I'll just settle for star gazing with my 14 inch scope. Nebraska Star Party anyone??

        Reply#5 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:37 PM EST

        There will be many improvements to how we analyze these worlds from afar... Moreover, there may very well be extraterrestrial life within our own solar system (e.g., Mars, Europa, Enceladus, Titan...) I am hopeful for, and fully expect many exciting discoveries yet well within our lifetimes!

        • 1 vote
        #5.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:56 PM EST

        While small exoplanets are interesting, playing devil's advocate, so what?

        That argument applies to any scientific research, anywhere.

          #5.2 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:17 PM EST

          So, what, you don't find science interesting unless it's immediately applicable to some terrestrial, physical accomplishment? Then why did you even bother reading the article?

          Whether or not we get FTL engines, we're probably going to send probes to Earth-like planets within our lifetimes. It would be nice to have, you know, a solid database of them ready to go.

            #5.3 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:03 PM EST
            Reply

            It seems so likely that we will find life someday with all these planets in the universe. What would you think if we never find life on another planet. What if we can explore other planets someday and we find no life. What would it mean to you? Would your views of how the universe began change at all?

              Reply#6 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:09 PM EST

              Well, it would mean that Earth really was a "Goldilocks" event, where everything turned out just right for life. So I would start looking over my shoulder for angry bears.

                #6.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:29 PM EST

                Never thought of that. So if it turns out we are really unique or extremely rare in the universe, then maybe trying to contact ET is not such a good idea?

                  #6.2 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:45 PM EST

                  Even assuming the most fantastic progress in space exploration - FTL drives, space craft capable of sustaining complete human populations for multiple generations, etc - we'll never really know if there is no other life out there. The universe is just too vast, and still growing. There will always be the possibility, and there will never be a definitive "No".

                  And although we can never be sure how alien life would react to contact with humans, "We don't know what will happen" is never a good reason to stunt progress. The search will never end, and it never should.

                  • 1 vote
                  #6.3 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:07 PM EST
                  Reply
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.