Apollo moon rocks challenge lunar water theory

NASA / Johnson Space Center

Chemical traces of water have been found in this moon rock, called the Genesis Rock. The moon rock was collected by astronauts during the Apollo 15 mission in 1971 and is thought to be a piece of the moon's primordial crust.

By Elizabeth Howell
Space.com

The discovery of "significant amounts" of water in moon rock samples collected by NASA's Apollo astronauts is challenging a longstanding theory about how the moon formed, scientists say.

Since the Apollo era, scientists have thought the moon came to be after a Mars-size object smashed into Earth early in the planet's history, generating a ring of debris that slowly coalesced over millions of years.

That process, scientists have said, should have flung away the water-forming element hydrogen into space.

But a new study suggests the accepted scenario is not possible given the amount of water found in moon rockscollected from the lunar surface in the early 1970s during the Apollo 15, 16 and 17 missions. By "water," the researchers don't mean liquid water, but hydroxyl, a chemical that includes the hydrogen and oxygen ingredients of water.

Those water-forming elements would have been on the moon all along, the scientist said. [Water on the Moon: The Search in Photos]

NASA / David R. Scott

Astronaut James B. Irwin, lunar module pilot, works at the Lunar Roving Vehicle during the first Apollo 15 lunar surface extravehicular activity at the Hadley-Apennine landing site.

"I still think the impact scenario is the best formation scenario for the moon, but we need to reconcile the theory of hydrogen," study leader Hejiu Hui, an engineering researcher at the University of Notre Dame, told Space.com.

The results were published in Nature Geoscienceon Sunday.

Water in moon's 'Genesis Rock'
Past studies have suggested water-forming elements came to the moon from outside sources long after the moon's crust cooled. The solar wind — a stream of particles emanating from the sun — as well as meteorites and comets were pegged as possible sources of water deposits on the moon in recent studies.

But that explanation does not account for the amount of water found in the Apollo samples, the researchers stated in the new study.

Because they found hydroxyl deep inside each sampled rock, the scientists say they have eliminated the solar wind moon water explanation, because those particles can penetrate the surface only slightly. An impact from an asteroid or comet could push the hydrogen in further, but it would not be as pristine as the samples the researchers observed, because it would have melted from the heat of the asteroid collision.

NASA

NASA's Mini-SAR instrument, which flew aboard India's Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft, found more than 40 small craters with water ice. The craters range in size from 1 to 9 miles (2 to 15 km) in diameter. Although the total amount of ice depends on its thickness in each crater, it's estimated there could be at least 600 million metric tons of water ice. The red circles denote fresh craters; the green circle mark anomalous craters.

Researchers probed samples from the late Apollo missions, including the famous "Genesis Rock" that was named for its advanced age of 4.5 billion years, about the same time the moon is thought to have formed.

Using an infrared spectrometer, the researchers found water embedded in the Genesis Rock, as well as all the Apollo samples they studied. This implies that the various landing sites of Apollo 15, 16 and 17 each had water present.

Hui's research flies in the face of past analyses of Apollo rocks that found they were very dry, except for a small bit of water attributed to the rock containers leaking when they were returned to Earth.

Past instruments that analyzed these samples, however, were not very sensitive. Hui said those older spectrometers had a sensitivity of around 50 parts per million (ppm), while his instruments were able to detect water at concentrations of about 6 ppm in anorthosites and 2.7 ppm in troctolites, which are both igneous rocks found in the moon's crust.

Troctolites form in the highlands as part of the moon's highland upper crust, and anorthosites are believed to be a part of the moon's "primary" crust, which solidified around the same time as other bodies in the solar system.

Finding water in the moon's crust, the scientists say, implies that the moon's rocks could have taken longer to crystallize than previously thought. The exact amounts of water present in these rocks, however, could vary in future measurements, depending on how they are calibrated.

Past moon water finds
Hui decided to analyze the Apollo rocks again following a suite of research results in recent years suggesting the moon is much wetter than previously thought, he said.

NASA's Clementine spacecraft found evidence of water iceafter scanning the surface with radar in 1996, but follow-up observations with the Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico suggested the spots where it found ice were in areas with too much sun for ice to survive. Instead of ice, later researchers chalked up the observations to piles of rubble.

NASA's Lunar Prospector found possible water in 1998 at both of the moon's poles, but the instrument was only able to detect the presence of hydrogen, not other elements.

Then in 2008, new lab work on Apollo lunar samples found hydrogen in lunar volcanic glasses.

Starting in September 2009, however, three spacecraft orbiting the moon found "unambiguous evidence" of water on the lunar surface. India's Chandrayaan-1 and NASA's Cassini and Deep Impact missions detected a hydrogen-oxygen chemical link — an indication of water or hydroxyl —  through wavelengths of light reflected off the moon.

These findings were believed to represent only small amounts of water. Just two months later, in November 2009, however, scientists for the Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) mission announced the spacecraft had found large deposits of ice at the moon's south pole.

Scientists then discovered a trove of ice in the south pole's Shackleton Crater in 2012. Based on the results, some groups say long-term human missions could live off the moon's water reserves while performing science, mining and other tasks on the moon.

Follow Elizabeth Howell @howellspace, or Space.com @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook and Google+.

Copyright 2013 Space.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss this post

Very interesting. If my understanding of the mass collection theory is correct, the presence of water all throughout the moon suggests it was created much faster than the impact scenario implies, yes?

I assume not all moons came into being the same way; what are some other theories as to their formation?

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:26 PM EST

A wet moon would be incredibly helpful for future spaceflight if we end up using moon ice as a fuel source

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:11 PM EST

There is an ocean of water to be recovered on our Earth's moon Luna, if only once we start using concentrated solar energy to refine these lunar mineral deposits. But I am really more interested in the He3 surface deposits, which is really the propulsion fuel we need for deep space exploration and development, not to mention life here on Earth. - RC

    Reply#3 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:23 AM EST

    There are a number of aneutronic fusion reactions which can be used for space propulsion systems based upon He3 as a primary fuel. - RC

      #3.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:54 AM EST
      Reply

      Please note that there are very large quantities of lithium 6 in our oceans alone (over 17 billion tons), combined with several trillion tons in the Earth's crust as well, and also very large quantities of boron 11 (our world currently produces over 4 million tons of boron minerals a year from our ocean and land resources). These aneutronic fusion fuels, combined with He3 (either mined on the Moon or synthesized/bred here on Earth) can provide us with a virtually unlimited supply of thermonuclear fuel for future thermonuclear propulsion systems for future space exploration and development.

      However, there may be little benefit to limiting ourselves to aneutronic fusion processes alone when it comes to future space travel, since any shadow shields needed for neutronic fusion processes in space can also double as cosmic ray shields for future astronauts on long duration flights, while also enabling us to breed additional neutronic fusion fuels such tritium. In fact, the energy produced within these shadow shields can also provide auxiliary power production for future spacecraft, too. This inclusion of neutronic fusion processes would also allow us to use our plentiful supplies of deuterium here on Earth, since there are over 50,000 cubic miles of heavy water in our world's oceans. If you also combine sub-critical mass fission fuels in a hybrid nuclear/thermonuclear reactor way aboard the future spaceships, your energy production can exceed by several millions of times the amount of energy any similar mass of chemical fuels alone could produce. - Rick Carter

        Reply#4 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:49 AM EST

        Even though the ratio of deuterium to normal hydrogen in our oceans is just 1 / 6400, you would still have to fill up all of our oceans here on Earth over 300 times with nothing but gasoline, in order to equal the amount of fusion energy contained in this deuterium fuel. This equals over 103 sextillion gallons of gasoline (or 103 followed by 24 zeroes). - RC

          #4.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:35 AM EST
          Reply

          only one solution, gotta get geologists up there now with boots, shovels and spectrophotometers...why the hell did we wait fifty years anyways? just how many screwed up presidents are WE going to have in charge before we get the simple stuff right.

            Reply#5 - Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:06 AM EST

            If you can squeeze a glass of water out of a rock. you got water. till then you got squat.

              Reply#6 - Mon Mar 4, 2013 3:11 PM EST
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.