So if that flyby asteroid DID hit Earth...

NASA

An artist's conception of Friday's flyby of asteroid 2012 DA14.

By Stephanie Pappas
LiveScience

On Friday, an asteroid half the length of a football field will buzz close by Earth. It won't hit the planet, but if it did, the collision would create an impact large enough to level 80 million trees — or the entire city of Washington, D.C., and its suburbs.

Scientists know this because an impact by an object the size of Friday's flyby asteroid has happened in human memory. In 1908, a 220-million-pound (100-million-kilogram) hunk of meteoroid or comet fragment hurtled into the atmosphere over Tunguska, Siberia, setting the sky ablaze and releasing the same amount of energy as 185 Hiroshima bombs.

Fortunately, the impact occurred over remote, forested land, taking the lives of hundreds of reindeer but no humans. At about 130 feet (40 meters) in diameter, the Tunguska space rock is similar in size to 2012 DA14, the asteroid en route for a Friday flyby, which is estimated to be about 150 feet (45 m). For comparison, that's about the size of the White House, said Mark Boslough, a physicist at Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico who has used computer modeling to re-create the Tunguska impact.

Public domain

Flattened trees from the Tunguska event photographed by the Leonid Kulik expedition in 1927.

Asteroid 2012 DA14 will approach as close as 17,200 miles (27,700 kilometers) from Earth at about 2:24 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on Friday, the closest-ever predicted flyby for an object this large. The approach isn't close enough to threaten Earth, though it will pass within the zone where satellites are orbiting. Siberia in 1908 wasn't so lucky.

Fire in the sky
A little after 7 a.m. local time on June 30, 1908, a man sitting in a chair at the Vanavara trading post in Siberia was violently thrown from his seat. The sky "split in two," the man later told a visiting scientist, and was "covered with fire." [Top 10 Greatest Explosions Ever]

Although he was 40 miles (64 km) from the scene of the impact, the man felt so much heat that he thought his shirt was on fire, according to NASA. Other eyewitnesses reported explosive sounds like artillery fire.

NASA

This graphic shows 2012 DA14's path past Earth

The Tunguska meteoroid likely entered the atmosphere at speeds of 33,500 miles per hour (53,913 km/h), NASA reports. There is no impact crater, because the pressure and heat caused by this screaming entry caused the space rock to explode. The blast leveled an area of about 800 square miles (1,287 square km).

Scientists visiting the site could tell exactly where the Tunguska meteoroid broke up, because the blast flattened trees in a radial pattern, like tire spokes emanating out from ground zero.

Piecing together Tunguska
It wasn't until 1927 that a research expedition reached the remote site of the blast. Led by Leonid Kulik, the curator for the meteorite collection at the St. Petersburg Museum, the scientists found that at the center of the impact zone, trees remained standing — but had been stripped of all branches and bark, a sign of an extremely fast shock wave.

The damage was so extensive that scientists originally thought that the Tunguska object was much larger than now believed, Boslough told LiveScience. Boslough's best estimate is 130 feet (40 m) in diameter, possibly as small as 98 feet (30 m) or as large as 164 feet (50 m).

"As we understood impacts and air bursts better and better, the size kept shrinking," he said.

That's because asteroid impacts were originally thought of as similar to nuclear bomb explosions. But nuclear bomb blasts explode outward in all directions, while space objects hurtling toward Earth carry their energy in a single direction.

"There's an energy concentration directly below the airburst, below the asteroid explosion, that doesn't exist for a nuclear explosion," Boslough said.

Because there were only a few witnesses to Tunguska and no scientific expedition to the area until 19 years after the fact, researchers have had to apply the lessons of later planetary impacts to unravel the mysteries of the 1908 event. The collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter in 1994 helped elucidate Tunguska, for example, Boslough said.

Asteroid 2012 DA14, the space rock that will pass by Earth Friday, is in no danger of hitting the planet. But if it did, the damage would be extensive, Boslough said, with the White House-sized asteroid capable of snuffing out the entire Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. [See Photos of Asteroid 2012 DA14]

Such impacts are estimated to occur on Earth every 1,000 to 2,000 years, Boslough said. But because the comets break up in the air and leave no impact crater, their tracks are hard to see. Forest has again sprung up over the Tunguska impact site, said Boslough, who has visited the area.

"If I didn't know that something had happened because of historical records, I would never suspect that anything had happened there," he said.

Follow Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas or LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook  and Google+.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

One of the mile-kilometer conversions in this report has been corrected.

This story was originally published on

Discuss this post

Pretty good reason to start giving some funding to NASA. Definitely within the realms of possibility to deflect something like this if we see it coming from far enough away

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:28 PM EST

the collision would create an impact large enough to level 80 million trees — or the entire city of Washington, D.C., and its suburbs.

Even though the Death Star was cancelled - note that it might have come in handy for situations like this, it's too bad we didn't have more notice so it could be deflected it to actually hit Congress. Then perhaps we could have elected leaders that could at least hold an intelligent conversation about the threat.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:41 PM EST

Hey now. I hate congress too, but I live less than 4 miles from the hill. Please don't deflect any astral bodies this way.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:48 PM EST

@Roallin: sorry about that - please amend that to be a smaller object but arriving at a higher velocity to be visited upon Clowngress. Hope that helps.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:09 AM EST

Why do I need an “Assault Style Rifle”?

Can you tell me when the end of civilization will be? When the solar flare will strike? Youtube "Doomsday Preppers" I am not that paranoid. My guns are for putting deer meat in the freezer, and stress relief. (while you on Youtube, "Exploding Pumpkins") But seriously, do you know when the NEXT meteor is going to hit? While never a Boy Scout, I believe their motto, Always be prepared”. I am not going to wait for FEMA to show up. (They have such a wonderful track record)

I have been posting this on other vines, as something of a cynical take on gun control. And granted this asteroid was not quite as apocalyptic as perhaps anticipated by the "Preppers".

It still brings into sharp relief, that this may not be as cynical as first thought. Naaahhh. Just kidding.

    #1.4 - Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:13 AM EST
    Reply

    Your math is off by a factor of 10. 33,500m/h is about 54,000km/h NOT almost 540,000km/h.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:59 PM EST

    Fixed that one, thanks for sounding the alarm.

    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:46 PM EST

    Definitely within the realms of possibility to deflect something like this if we see it coming from far enough away

    No. We need something to cull the herd on this planet. 7 Billion people are way too much.

    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:28 PM EST

    agree....if it hit washington we would be all set !!!

      #2.3 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:49 PM EST
      Reply

      There is no impact crater, because the pressure and heat caused by this screaming entry caused the space rock to explode.

      Actually, an expedition in 2010 established that there is a small crater there and it is now a lake. Cores from the bottom and ground penetrating radar were consistent with a cometary object (they do have rocks, just lots of ice to vaporize and go through thermal cycling on the way in)

      Need to be careful about saying that a rock exploded... an explosive type event would depend on the makeup of the object, if it contained ice (would explode), or was solid rock/iron (would not explode), or something in between... and of course the entry speed.. a bow shock wave is not an explosion. There is a huge difference between the energy and shock wave of an object entering at 17,000MPH vs. 33,500MPH.

      TL;DR... Comparing 2012 DA14 to Tunguska is not reasonable given how little we know about the makeup of both and their vastly different velocities.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#3 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:05 PM EST

      or the entire city of Washington, D.C.,

      Careful, the Democrats will want to ban asteroids.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:09 PM EST

      Banning asteroids would be a good thing.

        #4.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:56 PM EST

        Banning moronic, irrelevant posting trolls would be better.

        • 4 votes
        #4.2 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:05 PM EST

        What a fitting nickname you have for a typical rightwinger.

          #4.3 - Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:15 AM EST
          Reply

          "The Tunguska meteoroid likely entered the atmosphere at speeds of 33,500 miles per hour (539,130 km/h), NASA reports."
          I hope that NASA doesn't have to make MPH to km/h conversions too often...

          • 7 votes
          Reply#5 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:10 PM EST

          Is this rock traveling alone or does it have an entourage?

            Reply#6 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:12 PM EST

            Not sure, but if you go to spaceweather.com they have a nice chart of near earth rocks.

              #6.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:58 PM EST
              Reply

              539,130 mph Huh?

              How about joining the rest of the planet and and using just the metric system.

              Which I'm sure anyone reading this article has probably heard of.....

                Reply#7 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:07 PM EST

                NEVER!

                I measure distance in feet and liquids in gallons, and there's nothing you can do about it!

                  #7.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:41 PM EST
                  Reply

                  So, if friday's flyby asteriod DID hit earth ... would obama blame:

                  A) George Bush

                  B) Global Warming

                  C) The Republicans

                  D) Low Taxes on the Rich

                    Reply#8 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:15 PM EST

                    NO,

                    But just about every democrat out there WILL blame Ronald Reagan.....

                      #8.1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:34 AM EST
                      Reply

                      E) All of the above.

                        Reply#9 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:09 PM EST

                        I would feel a lot better if they told me that it won't hit the moon either.....

                          Reply#10 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:23 PM EST

                          Why? Meteors hit the moon all the time, and it's not nearly big enough to significantly affect the moon's orbit.

                          Besides, I'm sure they have the projected route pretty well mapped out. I think someone would notice if the moon's orbit overlapped to the point of a possible collision.

                          • 1 vote
                          #10.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:44 PM EST
                          Reply

                          So if the meteor were to hit the Earth, chances are pretty good it would hit water, just because most of the Earth's surface area is ocean. So what would the effect of a meteor hitting in the middle of the Pacific be, as opposed to a land mass? Would it cause a tsunami, or would it carry the force down to the bottom without displacing enough water to change tidal patterns?

                            Reply#11 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:46 PM EST

                            Shouldn't cause much of a tsunami... 150ft object isn't much displacement (relatively) and its speed would be significantly reduced by the time it hit the ocean. Its makeup would have a lot to do with it as well... it may just break up into dozens of pieces and spread its across miles of ocean. If it's more solid... very big splash... but, it also depends on the angle of entry, the depth of the water and distance from land as to what the effects would really be. Many variables at work.

                            Middle of the Pacific... my first guess... probably not much of an effect on any land masses other than a very big sonic boom.

                              #11.1 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:39 PM EST

                              Ah, but lets consider the angle of approach and how much of a shock wave is being built up in front of it upon entry into the atmosphere. Also, at point of impact, water will become superheated steam. I'm not sure what the expansion rate is for that, but boiling water expands to about 1700 times it's volume...I didn't take time to apply the ideal gas law...just did a quick internet search.

                              You get the idea. There will be some serious displacement going on.

                                #11.2 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:15 PM EST

                                David,

                                Middle of the Pacific... my first guess... probably not much of an effect on any land masses other than a very big sonic boom.

                                It's not the size, it's the velocity.......

                                Remember E=MC Squared? Energy equals mass accelerated.......

                                You can have a large mass moving slow as low velocity or a small mass moving at extremely high velocity. Works out the same........

                                If it was a block of ice.....

                                If it was a mixture of porous rock.....

                                If it was a piece of dense rock.....

                                If it was a solid piece of Iron.....

                                These were calculated using the density of water or ice as the impact point, effects calculated at a distance of one kilometer.

                                As you can easily see, the only way it actually hits the earth is if it is a solid lump of iron, the first three would result in an air burst. An air burst over the open ocean would have little effect on the planet and it's inhabitants......

                                But, if it occurred over a city on solid ground......

                                Major disaster.......

                                  #11.3 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:11 AM EST

                                  One more little note to give some context.

                                  33,000 miles per hour is only a notch or two above escape velocity......

                                  On the cosmic super starway, the cosmic cops would be pulling it over to ticket it for obstructing traffic....

                                  Think driving 55 in the fast lane where everyone else is doing 70 to 110......

                                    #11.4 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:41 AM EST
                                    Reply
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.