E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
Karl Tate, LiveScience infographic artist
An artist's interpretation of Bigfoot.
By Benjamin Bradford
LiveScience.com
Do new recordings from Oregon's Blue Mountains offer good evidence of the mysterious bipedal creature known as Bigfoot? That's what some are claiming after hearing a recording of strange roars and shrieks given to The Oregonian newspaper.
When people think of Bigfoot evidence, casts of big footprints and blurry photos and films often come to mind. But some of the more interesting bits of evidence are sound recordings of alleged vocalizations. One company, Sierra Sounds, markets a CD called "The Bigfoot Recordings: The Edge of Discovery." Narrated by "Star Trek" actor Jonathan Frakes, the recording claims to have captured vocalizations among a Bigfoot family.
The sounds include a series of guttural grunts, howls and growls. The liner notes offer testimonials from a "linguist" whose self-described credentials include playing the flute, speaking several languages and having "a Russian friend (who) thinks I'm Russian."
She confidently asserts that the tapes are not faked, and that the vocal range is too broad to be made by a human. She also suggests that Bigfoot individuals have a language, possibly including "Sasquatch swear words."
In his 1992 book "Big Footprints: A Scientific Inquiry Into the Reality of Sasquatch" (Johnson Books, 1992), physical anthropologist Grover Krantz discussed his experience with Bigfoot recordings: "One ... tape was analyzed by some university sound specialists who determined that a human voice could not have made them; they required a much longer vocal tract. A Sasquatch investigator later asked one of these experts if a human could imitate the sound characteristics by simply cupping his hands around his mouth. The answer was yes." As for other such recordings, Krantz "listened to at least 10 such tapes and find(s) no compelling reason to believe that any of them are what the recorders claimed them to be."
It's little wonder that one of the top scientific Bigfoot investigators held audio recordings in low regard: Sounds are simply poor evidence. [ Infographic: Tracking Belief in Bigfoot ]
Other explanations for the Blue Mountain sounds include foxes and coyotes, which — unlike Bigfoot — are known to exist in the area. Just because an animal call seems unusual or mysterious doesn't mean that it is. There are many factors than can affect how something sounds from far away, including temperature, wind and geographical features such as canyons.
Some suggest perhaps a hoaxer in the area is having a bit of fun with the local legend. And sometimes Bigfoot hunters go deep into the woods and "sound blast" pre-recorded "Bigfoot calls," hoping to elicit responses from any real Bigfoot nearby. Of course other people in the area can also hear the strange shrieks and howls coming from the dark wilderness and — not knowing that Bigfoot noisemakers are afoot — may report the sounds as genuine and unknown.
Acoustics and Bigfoot
According to "Good Morning America's" John Muller, this latest recording is not the only one; in fact the mysterious sounds have been coming out of the area since at least November. This raises an obvious question: If anyone seriously believes these sounds could be real evidence for Bigfoot, why haven't investigators been able to photograph or videotape the source of the sounds?
For example the cast of the optimistically titled Animal Planet show "Finding Bigfoot" has spent months in that area, and so far have come up empty-handed. Surely a well-financed cable television show would be able to provide its team members with the equipment they need; Neal Karlinsky of ABC News noted that the "Finding Bigfoot" crew has "every bit of cutting edge technology — night vision gear and all the sensors they can get their hands on." So what's the problem?
This isn't rocket science; it's the science of acoustics. With an array of sensitive microphones placed strategically throughout an area, it's relatively simple to triangulate the location of a sound to within a few feet almost instantly. If that same area is also covered by an array of wide-angle, high-resolution cameras (using infrared at night), it should be fairly simple to trigger cameras nearest the source of the sound to photograph whatever created it: fox, hoaxer, Bigfoot or something else.
Researchers could even use camera-mounted drones to help locate the vocalizations and monitor the area. Another option would be to set up a perimeter around areas where Bigfoot are said to be especially active and use sound-activated cameras. [ Rumor or Reality: The Creatures of Cryptozoology ]
Surely a group of 8- to-10-foot tall hairy bipedal animals can't be that hard to find if you place cameras around a hotspot of activity and wait a few weeks. Of course covering huge swaths of wilderness would not be cheap. But it would be a small price to pay if it finally provides hard evidence of Bigfoot — instead of more ambiguous roars, grunts and howls in the wilderness.
Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of "Skeptical Inquirer" science magazine and author of six books including "Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore." His Web site is www.BenjaminRadford.com.
Leave a Comment:
Yeah ok.... Over 100 years of human expansion, anthropologic study, and scientific advances in all areas relavent to this and we somehow missed a bipedal species living in our own forests. Just like Nessy its simply legend nothing more.
And dont give the crap that there are huge areas of unexplored areas in this country. Sure not every square foot has been explored but trust me if these things existed there would be more then blurry photos and foot print impressions!
GOP preppers, pulling their hair out over Obama's reelection
The truth is out there. And so is Bigfoot. Or a Fox. With gas. Something. I'm sure someting is out there. Maybe a bug.
Bigfoot's daughter is mated to the president,how much more proof do you need?As to the rest of her family in the woods,I am sure they miss her.
I grew up in one of the smallest communities on Oregon and saw a bigfoot print that was bigger than Shaquille O'Neals foot size, where no one in our neighborhood had feet that big, and it was 1956, before I was old enough to know what a bigfoot even was. No one can tell me something really big is not out there, surviving, and enjoying our forested lands humans rarely tread in. Most animals detect humans before we ever detect the them, and they disappear before we ever see them. It should be no surprise there are still mysteries in this world, including bigfoots.
Those who deny the possibility of a bigfoot haven't got any more scientific evidence than the folks that claim to have seen bigfoot, or have seen the footprints, or have heard the strange sounds they may actually make.
Why are there always people raining on our parades? Is there a segment of our society that justs hates the possibility of having to share our planet with one more species, and would rather hunt them down, to assure us this will never happen? Is it a hunter mentality that makes some of us want to kill something that is different from us?
Wildlife deserves sanctuary! If we were to stop killing it, we could observe it, even co-exist with it, because the fears of deadly guns and traps would slowly diminsh over time! We could actually have a garden of eden of our own, if we wanted to. Why don't we let the ecological circles provide the balance nature intended?
Why should we hunt apex predators for doing what nature designed them to do? Why does man have to invade the animal's habitat and disturb them with death and imbalance and deforestation and pesticides and crops resistant to the pesticides, creating a nature out-of-balance? Who in the hell do we think we are? Humans are not superior to animals!
We just have huge ranches convince us that their greed of profit is a justification for killing indigenous animals to save a few livestock bred for our consumption, but not to be shared with nature's predators. No, that would cost one rancher a couple dollars a year. Well, boo hoo! If we want to ranch in a wildlife habitat, why not try to achieve some balance with that habitat, instead of promoting extinction of nature's apex predators and their food sources we destroy?
Who made humans 'gods' to pass judgement on the planetary inhabitants that must co-exist with the us! Just because humans have the intelligence to make weapons and poisons and traps does not make it humane to use them on those we share the planet with. We should strive to co-exist, not replace the natives, as has so often been done in our history.