
Michael Euler / AP
Rolf-Dieter Heuer, director general for Europe's CERN particle physics center, gestures as he speaks during an interview with The Associated Press at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Saturday.
DAVOS, Switzerland — The world should know with certainty by the middle of this year whether a subatomic particle discovered by scientists is a long-sought Higgs boson, the head of the world's largest atom smasher says.
Rolf Heuer, director of the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, said he is confident that "towards the middle of the year, we will be there." By then, he said reams of data from the $10 billion Large Hadron Collider on the Swiss-French border near Geneva should have been assessed.
The timing could also help Scottish physicist Peter Higgs win a Nobel Prize, Heuer said in an interview with The Associated Press in the Swiss resort of Davos on Saturday.
CERN's atom smasher helped scientists declare in July their discovery of a new subatomic particle that Heuer calls "very, very like" a Higgs boson, that promises a new realm of understanding the universe.
The machine, which has been creating high-energy collisions of protons to investigate dark matter, antimatter and the creation of the universe, is being put to rest early this year. The data from it, however, takes longer to analyze.
"Suppose the Higgs boson is a special snowflake. So you have to identify the snowflake, in a big snowstorm, in front of a background of snowfields," Heuer said by way of analogy. "That is very difficult. You need a tremendous amount of snowfall in order to identify the snowflakes and this is why it takes time."
He said the Standard Model of particle physics describes only 5 percent of the universe, which many theorize occurred in a massive explosion known as the Big Bang.
To explain how subatomic particles, such as electrons, protons and neutrons, were themselves formed, Higgs and others in the 1960s envisioned an energy field where particles interact with a key particle, the Higgs boson.
The idea was that other particles interact with Higgs bosons, and the more they interact, the bigger their mass will be. But a big question remains: Is this new particle a variation of the Higgs boson, or the same as the single Higgs boson that was predicted?
The phrase "God particle," coined by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman, is used by laymen, not physicists, more as an explanation for how the subatomic universe works than how it all started.
"Now, if there is a deviation in one of the properties of this Higgs boson, that means we open a new window, for example, hopefully into the part of the dark universe, the 95 percent of the unknown universe," said Heuer.
"If you find the deviation," he added, "that means if it is not the — but a — Higgs boson, then we might find a fantastic window into the dark universe so we would make another giant leap from the visible to the dark."
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


I'm leaning to "A" and not "The".. but I can hope...
Here is a question for you... I think that the USA shutting down its own Supper collider was the biggest mistakes in our scientific community..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94481272
A collider provides research and discovery opportunities that (I believe) would keep us on par if not ahead in science... what do you (or commentors) think?
http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/About/Global-en.html
The current Member States are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
Observer States and Organizations currently involved in CERN programmes are: the European Commission, India, Japan, the Russian Federation, Turkey, UNESCO and the USA.
Non-Member States with co-operation agreements with CERN are: Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), Georgia, Iceland, Iran, Jordan, Korea, Lithuania, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, New Zealand, Pakistan, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Slovenia, South Africa, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates and Vietnam.
CERN also has scientific contacts with: China (Taipei), Cuba, Ghana, Ireland , Latvia, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mozambique, Palestinian Authority, Philippines, Qatar, Rwanda, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Uzbekistan and Venezuela.
As long as CERN keeps so many as some type of participant , I don't see the need to have another duplicate facility here .
Just my opinion .
What is that, like a giant Osterizer? :-P
Well Needle (Flame rolls his eyes @ Doug)... Your source actually hit on why... economics. Take a look at all the Non member states hopping on the back of CERN... and notice the US is not even a member state.. but Observer:
... WE the US always cry about improving our science and our leadership.... now we are just "followers" with a wallet.. instead of producing science we are "contributing" to other research.. we become wallets. Also the common goal of Two colliders (as the article suggest) could help sort through the "mounds" of data that CERN produced and shorten research/result times.
I hear you Flame77_7 .
But we still lead in many things or have for years .
Seeing other countries take charge or try to lead or advance in any technological endeavor should not be frowned on .
Sitting back and seeing what others have learned can be nice also .
Again Needle... I see your point... But it is my opinion that we have been "sitting back" too long.... We take a look at recent Science level per country to further illustrate that:
http://www.nationalmathandscience.org/solutions/challenges/staying-competitivewe are behind
I understand not leading.. but we should be competitive if we are to survive as a Country technologically.
There is one are US leads in... Giving.. We consistently give more in charity than any other nation.. we should not stop there... You mentioned we lead in many things... can you name some examples to put it into perspective... maybe post some links?
Hey Flame77_7 .
Who has a rover on Mars now getting ready to drill into a rock if it hasn't already ?
Who produces the most sought after commercial air crafts and combative air crafts in the world ?
We may have lost the edge or king of the hill in many areas from our giving , but this can set the stage for a giant leap into the future if we apply today's modern technological practices , knowledge and tools to amalgamate in production almost what ever we can imagine .
Without getting too lengthy .
OK... OK... (Friend request pending) I've always have had faith in America and it's place in the world... And I see you have the same spirit.... I think we have kind of sold of our birth right so to speak but I admit we aren't far gone if we:
"Look to the future, Learn from our past and Preserve the present."-Flame
Thank you Flame77_7 .
Your enjoyment in "The Cosmic Log" is showing .
Looking forward to some more fun out here .
The announcement of results is not very scientific, since It makes a "pressure bias". It's difficult for a simple scientist to communicate that there are actually no results when the boss has announced them. The consequence of such a pressure bias can be that one finds fast Neutrinos first, which slow down significantly later. I don't want to think about the consequences for the reputation of science (physics) if the pressure bias has produced a "Higgs Boson" out of a pressure biased "Randiom" in this case...