Bird fossil is 125 million years old — now we can tell its sex

Stephanie Abramowicz, NHM Dinosaur Institute

Researchers have determined the gender of a specimen of an ancient beaked bird Confuciusornis sanctus (reconstruction shown here) to be female, finding this species has drab females and flashy males like today's birds.

By Charles Choi
LiveScience

An ancient, beaked bird that lived in what is today northeastern China was ovulating when she, yes "she," perished some 125 million years ago, suggests new research that can reveal the gender of bird fossils.

Scientists investigated the ancient, beaked bird Confuciusornis sanctus. Hundreds of fossils of the extinct, crow-sized species are found in lake deposits in northeastern China. The area back then was "a seasonal forest that surrounded small lakes, a very rich ecosystem with a great variety of animals and plants," said researcher Luis Chiappe, paleontologist and director of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County's Dinosaur Institute.

Some fossils of this ancient bird were discovered with pairs of long, almost body-length ornamental tail feathers, while others were not. Scientists had suggested these differences were sexual in nature; in modern birds, males, such as peacocks, are often flamboyantly showy to court the opposite sex, while females, such as peahens, are typically rather drab, presumably to avoid attracting the attention of predators to themselves or their young.

Scientists had little evidence to prove whether the more flashy Confuciusornis sanctus fossils were male or not, however. But now researchers have found details in these skeletons that apparently enable clear gender identification, suggesting the showier fossils were indeed male. [ Avian Ancestors: Dinosaurs That Learned to Fly ]

Specifically, the researchers discovered medullary bone, spongy tissue unique to reproductively active female birds, in a specimen unearthed by local farmers. Medullary bone helps female birds manufacture eggshells.

"I think that it is so exciting to be able to say with certainty that this 125-million-year-old fossil bird was a reproductively active female," researcher Anusuya Chinsamy-Turan, a paleobiologist at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, told LiveScience.

"People might wonder why this has never been found before," Chinsamy-Turan added. "The reason is that for medullary bone to be observed, the female bird has to be in a particular physiological state — that is, ovulating, or just having laid eggs."

This female fossil did not possess ornamental feathers, which supports the idea that ancient female birds were as drab as their modern counterparts.

Intriguingly, researchers found medullary bone in some fossils even before the skeletons of those birds were full-grown. This suggests that this and other early birds matured sexually well before their skeletons matured.

"The most important conclusion is that early birds had reproductive patterns very different from their living counterparts and more akin to large dinosaurs," Chiappe told LiveScience.

The research could help scientists determine the sex of birds that lived millions of years ago, as well as shed light on ancient sexual maturity patterns. Future research should analyze other early bird species, Chiappe said.

The scientists detailed their findings online Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications.

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook   and Google+.

Discuss this post

very cool, but no doubt the creationists will be here soon with their nonsense about the Earth being 6000 years old and evolution being "from the pit of hell".

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:17 PM EST

I was just thinking that! You beat me to it! Even with all of the proof of evolution, millions of years of fossils, ect... Some would still rather beleive that it's a conspiracy!

    #1.1 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 5:51 PM EST
    Reply

    Markwills,

    That would be 13,000 years for the age of the earth. And only for some creationists, not all.But it does some much more dramatic and idiotic to just say 6,000, right? You have to add those seven days plus the time from Adam on down to 1 A.D, which is 4 ,000, then up to 2,000 A.D.

    Then again, the Bible doesn't say how long a day is actually. Lots of people assume it means 24 hours. Some creationists believe a day could last millions of years. Give or take a million and science can work with religion, not against it.But, let's not go there.This is about lovely birds!

    Personally, I think this discovery is delightful and fascinating. Now if they could just figure out how they sounded! I think they did that for a dinosaur. Now that would be sweet!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:57 AM EST

    well, a "day" a little less than 2 billion years and you would be pretty close to the age of the universe, , or a "day" a little less than 700 million years and you have the earth.

    I don't really have a quarrel with old earth creationists, or something akin to evolution being the way god created life, say a tweak here, a tweak there over time, etc. it can't be proven conclusively otherwise even if it doesn't seem that it is actually necessary either, so there is room for belief in god. it's the anti-science YEC "earth is a few thousand years old", "evolution is the work of the devil" stupidity that annoys me.

    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:14 PM EST

    I see that those intent on derailing the conversation by bringing God into a scientific topic through derision and the provocation of creationists have once again beat the creationists to the punch.

      #2.2 - Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:34 PM EST
      Reply

      The article states that the males were flashy. While the tail on the male could indeed be construed as such; it still seems quite drab to me otherwise. It would be great if they can find a fossil from soft sediment that preserves the feather impressions. I would love to see some actual color added.

        Reply#3 - Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:38 PM EST
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.