E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
Public domain
The Greek hero Theseus slays the minotaur in this 6th-century depiction on pottery.
By Stephanie Pappas
LiveScience
The civilization made famous by the myth of the Minotaur was as warlike as their bull-headed mascot, new research suggests.
The ancient people of Crete, also known as Minoan, were once thought to be a bunch of peaceniks. That view has become more complex in recent years, but now University of Sheffield archaeologist Barry Molloy says that war wasn't just a part of Minoan society — it was a defining part.
" Ideologies of war are shown to have permeated religion, art, industry, politics and trade, and the social practices surrounding martial traditions were demonstrably a structural part of how this society evolved and how they saw themselves," Molloy said in a statement.
The ancient Minoans
Crete is the largest Greek isle and the site of thousands of years of civilization, including the Minoans, who dominated during the Bronze Age, between about 2700 B.C. and 1420 B.C. They may have met their downfall with a powerful explosion of the Thera volcano, which based on geological evidence seems to have occurred around this time.
The Minoans are perhaps most famous for the myth of the Minotaur, a half-man, half-bull that lived in the center of a labyrinth on the island. [ 10 Beasts & Dragons: How Reality Made Myth ]
Minoan artifacts were first excavated more than a century ago, Molloy said, and archaeologists painted a picture of a peaceful civilization where war played little to no role. Molloy doubted these tales; Crete was home to a complex society that traded with major powers such as Egypt, he said. It seemed unlikely they could reach such heights entirely cooperatively, he added.
"As I looked for evidence for violence, warriors or war, it quickly became obvious that it could be found in a surprisingly wide range of places," Molloy said.
War or peace?
For example, weapons such as daggers and swords show up in Minoan sanctuaries, graves and residences, Molloy reported in November in The Annual of the British School at Athens. Combat sports were popular for men, including boxing, hunting, archery and bull-leaping, which is exactly what it sounds like.
Hunting scenes often featured shields and helmets, Molloy found, garb more suited to a warrior's identity than to a hunter's. Preserved seals and stone vessels show daggers, spears and swordsmen. Images of double-headed axes and boar's tusk helmets are also common in Cretian art, Molloy reported.
Even the yet-undeciphered language of Minoan may hint at a violent undercurrent. The hieroglyphs include bows, arrows, spears and daggers, Molloy wrote. As the script is untranslated, these hieroglyphs may not represent literal spears, daggers and weapons, he said, but their existence reveals that weaponry was key to Minoan civilization.
"There were few spheres of interaction in Crete that did not have a martial component," Molloy said.
Some of the violent nature of Minoan society might have been missed because archaeologists find few fortified walls on the island, Molloy wrote. It may be that the island's rugged topography provided its own defense, he said, leaving little archaeological evidence of battles behind.
Follow Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas or LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook and Google+.
Leave a Comment:
Who ever claimed the Minoans were peaceful in the first place? That's a silly claim to begin with.
Heinrich Schliemann perpetuated a lot of false ideas about early Greek civilization. I have no idea why people ever thought Minoans were a peaceful society. Even Greek myth paints the Minoans as a warlike people. Read the tale of the minotaur. King Minos goes to war with every city state near him, ostensibly to provide food for the Minotaur in the form of prisoners of war. He was so powerful that Athens simply acquiessed to his demands without fighting because they knew they would be defeated.
Early archaeology and even modern archaeology to some extent is more based on idealized interpretation rather than fact. The methodology has gotten much better in the last 150 years but you're still beholden to some theory crafter's interpretation of what's found. Schliemann is considered the grandfather of archaeology and he is one of the worst perpetrators of simply fabricated proof.
Native Americans were pretty warlike too.